2018
DOI: 10.1093/astrogeo/aty235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling neutron star magnetic fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to challenges based on observational data, many models with evolving magnetic field (e.g., see reviews and references in Cumming et al 2004;Gourgouliatos et al 2018;Pons & Viganò 2019) and angle (Philippov et al 2014;Dall'Osso & Perna 2017) were developed, as well as several modifications for the equation describing rotational energy losses were proposed (e.g., Beskin et al 1993; Beskin 2018 and references therein). These scenarios ★ E-mail: ignotur@gmail.com predict different timing evolution for single radio pulsars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to challenges based on observational data, many models with evolving magnetic field (e.g., see reviews and references in Cumming et al 2004;Gourgouliatos et al 2018;Pons & Viganò 2019) and angle (Philippov et al 2014;Dall'Osso & Perna 2017) were developed, as well as several modifications for the equation describing rotational energy losses were proposed (e.g., Beskin et al 1993; Beskin 2018 and references therein). These scenarios ★ E-mail: ignotur@gmail.com predict different timing evolution for single radio pulsars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the spectra quickly evolve to look like typical turbulent spectra, but if one examines the field structures in physical space, one finds that the evolution seems to saturate after a few Hall timescales, and the magnetic field hardly changes thereafter. This effect was noted in periodic-box geometry by [59,60], and was later also referred to as 'frozen turbulence' [70].…”
Section: Hall Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Hall evolution is not a dissipative process, it is related to changes in the magnetic field topology (Gourgouliatos et al 2018). The Hall time scale depends on the magnetic field of a NS as (Cumming et al 2004):…”
Section: Magnetic Field Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hall evolution is not a dissipative process, it is related to changes in the magnetic field topology (Gourgouliatos et al 2018). The Hall time scale depends on the magnetic field of a NS as (Cumming et al 2004): τHall=4πnnormaleitaliceL2cBp, where c is the speed of light, e is the elementary charge, B p is the poloidal dipolar magnetic field at the pole, n e is the electron number density, and L is length scale related to electric currents structure in the crust.…”
Section: Magnetic Field Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%