2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling neutron star mountains

Abstract: As the era of gravitational-wave astronomy has well and truly begun, gravitational radiation from rotating neutron stars remains elusive. Rapidly spinning neutron stars are the main targets for continuous-wave searches since, according to general relativity, provided they are asymmetrically deformed, they will emit gravitational waves. It is believed that detecting such radiation will unlock the answer to why no pulsars have been observed to spin close to the break-up frequency. We review existing studies on t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In concordance with previous work (e. g., Gittins et al 2021 and references therein), we find this theoretical upper limit to be much higher than observational constraints for millisecond pulsars, 10 −8 from the non-detection of gravitational waves (Abbott et al 2020) and in some cases as low as 10 −9 from the small measured slow-down of their rotation (e. g., Woan et al 2018). Thus, we confirm that the strength of their crust could allow millisecond pulsars to be much less axially symmetric than observed.…”
Section: Ellipticity and Gravitational Wave Emissionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In concordance with previous work (e. g., Gittins et al 2021 and references therein), we find this theoretical upper limit to be much higher than observational constraints for millisecond pulsars, 10 −8 from the non-detection of gravitational waves (Abbott et al 2020) and in some cases as low as 10 −9 from the small measured slow-down of their rotation (e. g., Woan et al 2018). Thus, we confirm that the strength of their crust could allow millisecond pulsars to be much less axially symmetric than observed.…”
Section: Ellipticity and Gravitational Wave Emissionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We see that the models begin to result in similar estimates near N ∼ 10 6 above 10 −6 . This may be the maximum allowed by the NS's crust (Ushomirsky et al 2000;Horowitz & Kadau 2009;Gittins et al 2020), which is only slightly disfavored by our results. We predict that only 10 5 , or 0.1%, of Galactic NSs have been probed above = 10 −5.5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…We expect a distribution of ellipticities across Galactic NSs. The maximum allowed ellipticity may be limited by the breaking strain of the NS crust to few × 10 −6 (Ushomirsky et al 2000;Horowitz & Kadau 2009;Gittins et al 2020). In order for a NS to support a larger , there may need to be an exotic solid phase in the core, such as crystalline quark matter (Owen 2005;Johnson-McDaniel & Owen 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this limit is much higher than those of old recycled millisecond pulsars (for which ε < 10 −8 ; Abbott et al 2020), young pulsars such as PSR J0537−6910 and the Crab pulsar are important because they have much stronger magnetic fields (and are hotter) and thus might have greater ellipticities. The ellipticity constraint of PSR J0537−6910 is also above or near estimates of the maximum ellipticity that can be sustained by an elastically deformed neutron star crust (Johnson-McDaniel & Owen 2013;Caplan et al 2018;Gittins et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%