2012
DOI: 10.1139/x2012-060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling number, vertical distribution, and size of live branches on coniferous tree species in British Columbia

Abstract: A compound, nonhomogeneous Poisson process was used to model the number, vertical distribution, and size of branches on four coniferous tree species: 134 western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.) on six sites, 45 amabilis fir (Abies amabilis Douglas ex J. Forbes) (three sites), 60 lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelm. ex S. Watson) (six sites), and 60 white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) trees (five sites) and two varieties: 66 coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menzie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the vertical distribution of forest biomass has been researched intensively (e.g. Tahvanainen and Forss 2008;Ruiz-González and Álvarez-González 2011;Nemec et al 2012;Jiménez et al 2013), studies that address the horizontal forest or tree biomass distribution are sparse. Kershaw and Maguire (1996) and Xu and Harrington (1998) modelled the horizontal distribution of leaf biomass -but not AGB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the vertical distribution of forest biomass has been researched intensively (e.g. Tahvanainen and Forss 2008;Ruiz-González and Álvarez-González 2011;Nemec et al 2012;Jiménez et al 2013), studies that address the horizontal forest or tree biomass distribution are sparse. Kershaw and Maguire (1996) and Xu and Harrington (1998) modelled the horizontal distribution of leaf biomass -but not AGB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crown morphology plasticity of a sapling influences both light capture and the use of growth resources and may reflect important implications related to the ability of a sapling to conduct efficient photosynthesis in the understory of a light-limiting environment and to compete with neighbours (Williams, Messier & Kneeshaw, 1999;Nikinmaa et al, 2003;Navarro-Cerrillo et al, 2018). For conifer saplings, crown morphology plasticity has been described by a series of characteristics in terms of the number of branches per whorl, the ratio of leader height to lateral branch growth, and the crown depth or crown ratio (Williams, Messier & Kneeshaw, 1999;Sattler & Lemay, 2001;Nemec, Parish & Goudie, 2002;Saud et al, 2016). The crown morphology of conifer saplings varies from a conical crown form to a more flat-topped form in the forest understory under different light conditions (Pearcy & Yang, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the vertical distribution of forest biomass has been researched intensively (e.g. Nemec et al 2012, Jiménez et al 2013, Ruiz-González and Álvarez-González 2011, Tahvanainen and Forss 2008, studies that address the horizontal forest or tree biomass distribution are sparse. Kershaw and Maguire (1996) and Xu and Harrington (1998), modelled the horizontal distribution of leaf biomassbut not AGB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%