2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of a supercritical CO2 power cycle for nuclear fusion reactors using RELAP5–3D

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CATHARE, RELAP, TRACE, ATHLET, SCTRAN, and SAS4A/SASSYS-1 [5][6][7][8]. Because sCO 2 is considered a working fluid for 4th generation reactor concepts as well as for the proposed heat removal system, work is in progress to extend or couple these system codes for the simulation of sCO 2 power cycles [1,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CATHARE, RELAP, TRACE, ATHLET, SCTRAN, and SAS4A/SASSYS-1 [5][6][7][8]. Because sCO 2 is considered a working fluid for 4th generation reactor concepts as well as for the proposed heat removal system, work is in progress to extend or couple these system codes for the simulation of sCO 2 power cycles [1,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Idaho National Laboratory expanded the function of RELAP5-3D for next generation nuclear plant simulation and analysis. [29][30][31] The GFR proposed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 19 and nuclear fusion reactor designed under TECNO_FUS 32 was modeled and simulated by RELAP5-3D. The calculation capacity of the RELAP5-3D was verified and several typical transients were simulated to study the thermal-hydraulic characteristics of the SCO 2 -cooled reactor system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CO 2 supercritical Brayton cycle, CO 2 releasing heat energy at supercritical state, which differs from CO 2 transcritical power cycle. Batet et al [16] established a model for CO 2 power cycle in using nuclear power and analyzed the performance in stable condition and variable condition. Garg et al [17] compared the performance between CO 2 transcritical power cycle and steam transcritical power cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%