2014
DOI: 10.1016/s2095-4956(14)60143-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of a tubular solid oxide fuel cell with different designs of indirect internal reformer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 shows the layout of the 230 kW SOFC system for distributed power generation. The features of the SOFC stack comply with those recently described in [58,59]. The stack has tubular geometry, with active tube length 1.5 m and radius 0.9 cm.…”
Section: Lca-lcc Toolboxmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 shows the layout of the 230 kW SOFC system for distributed power generation. The features of the SOFC stack comply with those recently described in [58,59]. The stack has tubular geometry, with active tube length 1.5 m and radius 0.9 cm.…”
Section: Lca-lcc Toolboxmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A Ni based catalyst is employed also in the fuel steam reformer. According to Dokmaingam et al [58] and Kim-Lohsoontorn et al [59], this is directly coupled to the SOFC stack, in an IIR-SOFC (Indirect Internal Reforming-SOFC) configuration. This geometry allows to obtain an efficient direct transfer of the heat dissipated by the exothermic electrochemical reactions occurring in the SOFC stack, to the endothermic methane steam reforming reaction taking place in the adjacent steam reformer.…”
Section: Lca-lcc Toolboxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…temperature Performance loss and failure due to thermo-mechanical stresses and chemical interaction 1300 K [51][52][53] Max. difference in thermal expansion coefficients Performance loss and failure due to thermo-mechanical stresses 10%-17% [51][52][53] Transient temperature gradients Thermo-mechanical stresses 20K/cm 54,55 Steady state temperature differences in axial direction of stack Thermo-mechanical Stresses 150K [51][52][53] Min. FU Thermo-mechanical stresses 40% [51][52][53] Max.…”
Section: Potential Effect Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%