2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of carbon–carbon composite ablation in rocket nozzles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Carbon/carbon (C/C) composites have been widely studied due to their excellent advantages, such as low density, high specific strength, low thermal expansion coefficient and superior ablation resistance [1][2][3]. These properties make them attractive in aeronautical and astronautical applications as structural materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon/carbon (C/C) composites have been widely studied due to their excellent advantages, such as low density, high specific strength, low thermal expansion coefficient and superior ablation resistance [1][2][3]. These properties make them attractive in aeronautical and astronautical applications as structural materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, microstructure defects are also induced during graphitization, including nano-and micro-scale matrix annular cracking and fiber/matrix (F/M) interface slackening or even debonding [3][4][5]. The defects result in great decrease of mechanical properties [4] and then lead to deteriorative ablation and friction performances since their failures also involve mechanical denudation mechanism controlled by mechanical strength [6][7][8] (including out-of-plane compressive strength and interlaminal shear strength (ILSS)). Namely, a low mechanical property could lead to a severe mechanical denudation and then a poor ablation or abrasive resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ablation properties of C/C composites can be studied using plasma ablation test, oxyacetylene torch, arc heating test, and/or ground ignition test [5][6][7][8][9][10]. However, the former three methods simulate relatively simple ablation conditions, unlike the real conditions of an operating SRM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%