2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.10.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of coating thickness distribution and its application in offline programming software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 1a, it is clear that the spray angle was positively correlated to the height and negatively to the width of the sample profiles, being consistent with the previous studies [24,44]. The smaller effect of spray angle between 75° and 90° was attributed to the smaller relative deposition efficiency drop; in comparison, such phenomenon was observed between 80° and 90° spray angle in [24].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In Figure 1a, it is clear that the spray angle was positively correlated to the height and negatively to the width of the sample profiles, being consistent with the previous studies [24,44]. The smaller effect of spray angle between 75° and 90° was attributed to the smaller relative deposition efficiency drop; in comparison, such phenomenon was observed between 80° and 90° spray angle in [24].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This observation suggests that the more levels of traverse speed may be employed in the experimental design matrix for the ANN training dataset to integrate more relevant information into an ANN model, especially at low traverse speeds (i.e., between 25 and 100 mm/s). The lower traverse speed resulted in a thicker and sharper track profile, while widening the track profile as also seen in [9,24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations