1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00844.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of electromagnetic fields in thin heterogeneous layers with application to field generation by volcanoes-theory and example

Abstract: When interpreting electromagnetic fields observed at the Earth’s surface in a realistic geophysical environment it is often necessary to pay special attention to the effects caused by inhomogeneities of the subsurface sedimentary and/or water layer and by inhomogeneities of the Earth’s crust. The inhomogeneities of the Earth’s crust are expected to be especially important when the electromagnetic field is generated by a source located in a magma chamber of a volcano. The simulation of such effects can be carri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the primary methods of 3-D MT forward modelling are the finite difference method (FDM), the finite element method (FEM) and the integral equation method (IEM). Avdeev et al (1997) and Singer & Fainberg (1999) successfully applied this technique to MT forward modelling. Wannamaker (1984) first applied the IEM to 3-D MT forward calculation for only a simple model with a few heterogeneous blocks because the matrix is dense, which was difficult to solve at that time.…”
Section: Formulation Of 3-d Mt Forward Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the primary methods of 3-D MT forward modelling are the finite difference method (FDM), the finite element method (FEM) and the integral equation method (IEM). Avdeev et al (1997) and Singer & Fainberg (1999) successfully applied this technique to MT forward modelling. Wannamaker (1984) first applied the IEM to 3-D MT forward calculation for only a simple model with a few heterogeneous blocks because the matrix is dense, which was difficult to solve at that time.…”
Section: Formulation Of 3-d Mt Forward Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, it is worth noticing that despite the fact that throughout our consideration the layer was assumed to be thin, the terms correcting Maxwell's solution for finite thickness of the layer cannot be derived from the generalized thin-sheet approximation (Dmitriev, 1969;Ranganayaki and Madden, 1980). As discussed by Singer and Fainberg (1999), the generalized thin-sheet approximation is the first-order approximation with respect to small parameters h √ ωμ 0 σ ∼ √ h/v s t and h/λ τ , where λ τ is the characteristic length of the field variations along the surface of the layer. These parameters are generally independent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This optimization procedure relies on the same ‘energy norm’ which is used to evaluate the norms of the integral operator in the continuous equation and the matrix of the system of linear equations. Taking into consideration the fact that the norms of the continuous and discrete operators depend only on the maximum lateral contrast of the conductivity distribution, the accuracy of the approximants can be reliably evaluated and used to terminate the computation, once the necessary relative accuracy of the numerical solution has been reached. All the expressions for matrix elements are reduced to presentations that were used for the MIDM thin layer codes, previously described by Singer & Fainberg (1999). Therefore, we use the same routines that were designed with a view to achieving the highest accuracy of the kernel matrix evaluation, which can be achieved for the given grid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dawson & Weaver 1979), we may use auxiliary 2-D 2.5-D or 3-D computations to determine the normal field. In case of a 3-D background model, the normal field can be found from the IE using a coarse grid and then detailed to a finer grid as described by Singer & Fainberg (1999) for thin layer models.…”
Section: N O R M a L B A C Kg Ro U N D A N D A N O M A L O U S F I mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation