2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0961-9534(01)00016-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of energy and carbon budgets of wood fuel coppice systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
66
1
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
66
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the harvested willow is assumed to have a lower energy content as the material is exported from the farm to the power plant directly after harvest, allowing no time for drying. Furthermore, the energy ratios of the willow scenarios in this study are lower than other reported values by Matthews (2001) and Gonz alez-Garc ıa et al (2012b) as they do not consider transport in their analysis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the harvested willow is assumed to have a lower energy content as the material is exported from the farm to the power plant directly after harvest, allowing no time for drying. Furthermore, the energy ratios of the willow scenarios in this study are lower than other reported values by Matthews (2001) and Gonz alez-Garc ıa et al (2012b) as they do not consider transport in their analysis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…The range of global warming potential figures in this study (5.84-11.65 kg CO 2 -eq/GJ) are comparable to those reported by Dubuisson & Sintzoff (1998), but are all higher than those of 4.8 kg CO 2 -eq/GJ reported by Matthews (2001) as their analysis assumes lower fertilization rates and includes only transport of 3.2 km to the farm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Comparing these results with others reported by Dubuisson and Sintzoff (1998), it can be shown that depending on the level of intensification, values regarding CO 2 emissions vary from 101-160 MJ kg -1 of CO 2 . Whereas the results reported by Matthews (2001) showed mean values of 209.8 MJ kg -1 of CO 2 . In the latter study, the calculation of overall energy and carbon budgets required a set of 'standard' assumptions about practices and resultant energy inputs to be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…These standard assumptions accounted for all activities involved in production and delivery of biofuel within the immediate vicinity of the farm (3.2 km). The carbon emissions coefficient exhibited similar sensitivity to input assumptions (Matthews 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Burning biomass also avoids anaerobic decomposition that results in CH4 emissions, which are known to have 21 times the greenhouse effects of CO2. Generally power production from biomass is considered carbon neutral, with burning emissions balanced by the carbon capture of the next crop [45,46]. In some instances, with non-invasive farming methods, some researchers even claimed carbon negativity which means that less carbon is emitted than is removed from the atmosphere [47,48].…”
Section: Ghg Emission Caused By Power Generation From Lignocellulosicmentioning
confidence: 99%