2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgsce.2023.204953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of geomechanical response for coal and ground induced by CO2-ECBM recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the permeability of the coal seam and the pressure of coalbed methane significantly evolve with changes in fracture roughness. In contrast, other models of coalbed methane extraction published so far [2,3,7,15] cannot quantitatively characterize this feature. Hence, the analytical advantages of this study are fully highlighted.…”
Section: The Verification Of Model Correctness and Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the permeability of the coal seam and the pressure of coalbed methane significantly evolve with changes in fracture roughness. In contrast, other models of coalbed methane extraction published so far [2,3,7,15] cannot quantitatively characterize this feature. Hence, the analytical advantages of this study are fully highlighted.…”
Section: The Verification Of Model Correctness and Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…These studies predominantly involve experiments, including the mechanism of CO 2 injection, the displacement effects under various conditions, and the detailed analysis of the reaction between CO 2 and coalbeds. (2) Mechanism analyses of multi-field coupling during the CO 2 -ECBM process [14][15][16] primarily employ numerical simulation and constitutive model development to explore the displacement efficiency of CO 2 under different pressures, temperatures, and in situ stress, as well as its impact on the microstructure of coalbeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%