2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of interlaminar fracture processes in composites using interface elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our analysis of cracking and delamination in carbon fibre-reinforced laminates, a bilinear traction separation law used by a number of researchers [17][18][19][20][21] to describe the damage and fracture behaviour, was employed. A schematic example of a bi-linear tractionseparation law is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Cohesive Law and Its Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our analysis of cracking and delamination in carbon fibre-reinforced laminates, a bilinear traction separation law used by a number of researchers [17][18][19][20][21] to describe the damage and fracture behaviour, was employed. A schematic example of a bi-linear tractionseparation law is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Cohesive Law and Its Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dal punto di vista fenomenologico si è evidenziata la presenza di due diversi meccanismi di frattura, uno dei quali responsabile di una parziale instabilità durante la propagazione. Si sono poi determinate le proprietà all'innesco in accordo con la MF ed è stato applicato un approccio numerico di modellazione coesiva [7,8]. Lo strumento di calcolo ha prodotto risultati in buon accordo con i dati sperimentali relativi all'innesco.…”
Section: Andena Marta Rink Roberto Frassineunclassified
“…The law that affords the best agreement is the one selected by the inverse procedure. On the contrary, several authors (Andena et al 2006;Bianchi et al 2006;Slowik et al 2006) developed inverse methods to identify the best CL without any previous assumption about its shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%