2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of isobaric stages of adsorption cooling cycle: An optimal shape of adsorption isobar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the predicted step positions (α) of COFs in Figure 3d−f demonstrated that all high-performing COFs generally exhibited lower step positions (α ≤ 0.4) under varying working conditions, consistent with the preferential stepwise adsorption or type V isotherm from both the thermodynamic and energetic perspectives. 14,36,38,39 Specifically, COFs with 0.2 < α ≤ 0.4 are favorable for heating and cooling, whereas COFs with 0 < α ≤ 0.2 are better candidates for ice making, which is resulted from the high working capacity at defined operating conditions (Figure S6). Besides, the top-performing COFs exhibited not only the high working capacity (ΔW) and relatively low step positions but also the moderate averaged enthalpy of adsorption (−⟨ΔH ads ⟩ ∼40 kJ/mol), both of which are favorable for the COP of MOFs (Figures S7 and S8).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the predicted step positions (α) of COFs in Figure 3d−f demonstrated that all high-performing COFs generally exhibited lower step positions (α ≤ 0.4) under varying working conditions, consistent with the preferential stepwise adsorption or type V isotherm from both the thermodynamic and energetic perspectives. 14,36,38,39 Specifically, COFs with 0.2 < α ≤ 0.4 are favorable for heating and cooling, whereas COFs with 0 < α ≤ 0.2 are better candidates for ice making, which is resulted from the high working capacity at defined operating conditions (Figure S6). Besides, the top-performing COFs exhibited not only the high working capacity (ΔW) and relatively low step positions but also the moderate averaged enthalpy of adsorption (−⟨ΔH ads ⟩ ∼40 kJ/mol), both of which are favorable for the COP of MOFs (Figures S7 and S8).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the working pair, an adsorption isotherm with one single very steep uptake step is preferred from an energetic perspective, as this will display the highest thermodynamic efficiency . Also from a dynamic perspective, a stepwise isotherm is preferred, , as only a small change in relative sorbate pressure is needed for a large change in loading, that is, a large heat effect (see, e.g., AQSOA-Z01, Figure ). Hysteresis during desorption is undesired, as this will increase the required desorption temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the working fluid, an adsorption isotherm with a single very steep uptake step is preferred from an energy perspective, as this will display the highest thermodynamic efficiency . Also from a dynamic perspective, a stepwise isotherm is preferred, , as only a small change in the relative sorbate pressure is needed for a large change in loading. Hysteresis during desorption is undesired, as this will increase the required desorption temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%