2013
DOI: 10.1080/19476337.2012.692122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of isotherms and their hysteresis analysis in gelatin from different sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hysteresis is related to the filling and emptying of voids space within the materials, and it reflects the materials structural and conformation rearrangement [3]. Figure 3 shows hysteresis of dried crab stick product and it could be seen that a hysteresis loop extended over the entire range of a w (0 -0.9) and the shape of hysteresis was well described by the hysteresis of high protein and starchy foods [17,19,21]. A huge hysteresis loop was observed at low a w (< 0.6) implying that the emptying of voids space in the material was not the same as moisture filling ability (moisture content line of desorption was higher than adsorption line; Figure 2) due to most of the water in this a w range is classified as a monolayer (region I) and multilayer waters (region II).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The hysteresis is related to the filling and emptying of voids space within the materials, and it reflects the materials structural and conformation rearrangement [3]. Figure 3 shows hysteresis of dried crab stick product and it could be seen that a hysteresis loop extended over the entire range of a w (0 -0.9) and the shape of hysteresis was well described by the hysteresis of high protein and starchy foods [17,19,21]. A huge hysteresis loop was observed at low a w (< 0.6) implying that the emptying of voids space in the material was not the same as moisture filling ability (moisture content line of desorption was higher than adsorption line; Figure 2) due to most of the water in this a w range is classified as a monolayer (region I) and multilayer waters (region II).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A huge hysteresis loop was observed at low a w (< 0.6) implying that the emptying of voids space in the material was not the same as moisture filling ability (moisture content line of desorption was higher than adsorption line; Figure 2) due to most of the water in this a w range is classified as a monolayer (region I) and multilayer waters (region II). Therefore, the difficulty of moisture removal in this region depends on the capillary shape, the differences in the mobility of the matrix, or the strengthening of interactions between water and biopolymers [17,19]. In contrast, a small hysteresis loop was found at high a w (> 0.6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[] and Aguirre‐Alvarez et al . [] tested the Peleg, GAB, FF, Oswin, and HEN models for starch powders (0.05–0.95 a w ) and gelatin powders (0–0.90 a w ), and concluded that the Peleg model provided the best fit to the desorption data. The MBET model is not widely applied in literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%