Modelling of Molasses Fermentation for Bioethanol Production: A Comparative Investigation of Monod and Andrews Models Accuracy Assessment

Abstract

Modelling has recently become a key tool to promote the bioethanol industry and to optimise the fermentation process to be easily integrated into the industrial sector. In this context, this study aims at investigating the applicability of two mathematical models (Andrews and Monod) for molasses fermentation. The kinetics parameters for Monod and Andrews were estimated from experimental data using Matlab and OriginLab software. The models were simulated and compared with another set of experimental data that was not used for parameters’ estimation. The results of modelling showed that μmax = 0.179 1/h and Ks = 11.37 g.L−1 for the Monod model, whereas μmax = 0.508 1/h, Ks = 47.53 g.L−1 and Ki = 181.01 g.L−1 for the Andrews model, which are too close to the values reported in previous studies. The validation of both models showed that the Monod model is more suitable for batch fermentation modelling at a low concentration, where the highest R squared was observed at S0 = 75 g.L−1 with an R squared equal to 0.99956, 0.99954, and 0.99859 for the biomass, substrate, and product concentrations, respectively. In contrast, the Andrews model was more accurate at a high initial substrate concentration and the model data showed a good agreement compared to the experimental data of batch fermentation at S0 = 225 g.L−1, which was reflected in a high R squared with values 0.99795, 0.99903, and 0.99962 for the biomass, substrate, and product concentrations respectively.

Optimization and Scale-Up of Fermentation Processes Driven by Models

“…On the other hand, unstructured kinetic models generally contain few parameters, which, from a computational perspective, is usually advantageous. At present, a significant portion of recent studies concern bioethanol production [ 38 , 39 , 40 ], biosurfactant production [ 41 , 42 ], bacterial and fungal biomass production [ 43 , 44 ], as well as microalgal growth [ 45 , 46 , 47 ].…”

“…The exploration into ideal genetic engineering modification strategies and fermentation conditions based on mechanistic and data-driven models enable efficient biological production on a laboratory scale; however, scaling-up fermentation processes from the laboratory to industrial production level requires more work. In industrial bioreactors, the spatiotemporal gradients of substrate, temperature, and pH can affect the metabolism of the resulting strains [ 39 , 129 ]. In addition, strong agitation in industrial bioreactors may also cause shear damage to cells and reduce their viability [ 130 ].…”

A New Model of Alcoholic Fermentation under a Byproduct Inhibitory Effect

“…During the fermentation process, the pH value was adjusted at pH = 4.5 by the automatic addition of 0.1 M NaOH and the stirring speed was maintained at 250 rpm. The fermentation temperature was kept at 30 °C using a water jacket . The fermentation was carried out under microaeration conditions (1 vvm) for 2 h and turned later to anaerobic during the rest time of fermentation.…”

Optimization of citric acid production by Aspergillus niger using two downgraded Algerian date varieties

“…and complex compounds (eg. natural products and cellulosics), or as preliminary products and compounds evolving from secondary metabolism ( Zentou et al, 2019 ). Several fermentation procedures are used for the large-scale production of organic chemicals and high-energy fuels from renewable sources ( Angumeenal and Venkappayya, 2013 ).…”