Studies on Water Management Issues 2012
DOI: 10.5772/29581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of Surface Water Quality by Catchment Model SWAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attempts to model the effects of climate change on catchment processes are numerous, classified as empirical-statistical, physical, or conceptual models. Two examples for conceptual models are the generalized watershed loading functions (GWLF) model (Schneiderman et al 2010) and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model (Glavan and Pintar 2012).…”
Section: Catchment Related Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to model the effects of climate change on catchment processes are numerous, classified as empirical-statistical, physical, or conceptual models. Two examples for conceptual models are the generalized watershed loading functions (GWLF) model (Schneiderman et al 2010) and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model (Glavan and Pintar 2012).…”
Section: Catchment Related Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency, the quality and the reliability of the model results were evaluated for the calibration and validation periods using graphical comparison and three 3967 HISTORICAL LAND USE CHANGE AND ITS EFFECT ON BLUE AND GREEN WATER well-known and generally used statistical measures: the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) (indicates the quality of relationship between observed and predicted results), the coefficient of efficiency (determines the relative magnitude of the residual variance compared with the measured data variance) (Nash and Sutcliffe, 1970) and the percent bias (PBIAS) (measures the average tendency of simulated flows to be larger or smaller than their observed counterparts) (Glavan & Pintar, 2012).…”
Section: Model Setup and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration is a process to better parameterize a model to a given set of local conditions, thereby reducing prediction uncertainty. During calibration, parameters are varied within an acceptable range until a satisfactory correlation is achieved between measured and simulated data [18,25]. In this study, calibration of the model was performed for flow and sediment on a daily and monthly basis.…”
Section: Model Setup and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other studies report the positive effect of measures (rotation, conservation tillage, cover crops, contour farming, vegetative filter strips, terracing, etc.) on soil loss reduction at the field scale [1,[10][11][12][13][14][15] or the river basin scale [16][17][18][19][20][21]. As the performance of measures is highly dependent on local circumstances (e.g., soil type, slope, crop and climate), combining different measures can lead to a greater reduction of soil loss and sediment yield [16,19,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%