2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.02.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of the high-frequency fundamental symmetric Lamb wave using a new boundary element formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to domain-discretized methods, boundary element meshing is only limited to the boundary of a domain with the help of fundamental solutions and as a result significant reduction in the degrees of freedom is achieved. This advantage has also been shown in the modelling of ultrasonic Lamb waves [7], which is particularly attractive for high-frequency cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In contrast to domain-discretized methods, boundary element meshing is only limited to the boundary of a domain with the help of fundamental solutions and as a result significant reduction in the degrees of freedom is achieved. This advantage has also been shown in the modelling of ultrasonic Lamb waves [7], which is particularly attractive for high-frequency cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The corresponding singular integrals in these boundary integral equations were calculated using the techniques introduced in Refs. [16,17,19].…”
Section: The Dual Boundary Integral Equations In the Laplace Transformentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various computational techniques have been developed for generating the needed theoretical dispersion curves, including analytical methods employing matrix strategies (e.g., the transfer matrix method from Thomson 15 , Haskell 16 , and Lowe 17 , the stiffness matrix method from Kausel and Roësset 18 , Kausel and Peek 19 , and Kausel 20 or numerical methods such as finite element (FE) simulations [21][22][23][24] and boundary element simulations 25 . The numerical methods can handle material and geometric complexities to more closely model real-world test conditions compared with the analytical approaches; however, use of the numerical methods is usually constrained by their computational costs and the need to purchase commercial software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%