2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(00)00045-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of tornado and microburst-induced wind loading and failure of a lattice transmission tower

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…leg members) and primary bracing members are regarded as beam elements, while the redundant members (e.g. secondary bracings) are considered as truss elements due to their single bolt connections at the end, low flexure stiffness and low moments transferring to other structural members [31,36,37]. Compared with the complexity of the truss modelling method, the truss-beam method simplifies the modelling process on which current numerical research on behaviours of transmission tower structures are based [24,38,39].…”
Section: Modelling the Individual Members Of Steel Lattice Transmissimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…leg members) and primary bracing members are regarded as beam elements, while the redundant members (e.g. secondary bracings) are considered as truss elements due to their single bolt connections at the end, low flexure stiffness and low moments transferring to other structural members [31,36,37]. Compared with the complexity of the truss modelling method, the truss-beam method simplifies the modelling process on which current numerical research on behaviours of transmission tower structures are based [24,38,39].…”
Section: Modelling the Individual Members Of Steel Lattice Transmissimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution with time of the velocity is shown in Figure 11 for three typical values of T, while recommended values of the parameter T for three TS event categories are indicated in Table 2. Finally, within the band of width b, the vertical profile may be determined by the equation (11), proposed by Savory et al (2001) for TS winds. Note that, employing the heights zmax indicated in Table 2, the value of Vmax may be determined if Vo is specified.…”
Section: A Simplified Model Of a Squall Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under a certain combination of axial compression and lateral impact, if the tube response remained bounded this indicated on a dynamically stable behaviour. Unbounded responses, however, denoted a dynamic instability and a failure condition (Simitses [17] and Savory et al [18]). It should be noted that for a multi degrees freedom system, an exact solution for the dynamic limit point load does not exist.…”
Section: Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%