2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling pellet-clad mechanical interaction during extended reduced power operation in bonded nuclear fuel

Abstract: +LJKOLJKWV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the buffer and kernel are de-bonded, as has been assumed elsewhere [76] , the stress concentration in the kernel might not be as large and so the crack might not 'jump' from one material to the other. This in turn, might reduce the stress concentration in the SiC, again analogous to the situation observed in conventional pellet-clad interaction [77] . We are currently working to implement both residual stress and irradiation-induced shrinkage in our model.…”
Section: Kernel-ipyc Interfacementioning
confidence: 65%
“…If the buffer and kernel are de-bonded, as has been assumed elsewhere [76] , the stress concentration in the kernel might not be as large and so the crack might not 'jump' from one material to the other. This in turn, might reduce the stress concentration in the SiC, again analogous to the situation observed in conventional pellet-clad interaction [77] . We are currently working to implement both residual stress and irradiation-induced shrinkage in our model.…”
Section: Kernel-ipyc Interfacementioning
confidence: 65%
“…At the end of the ramp, the crack width was 10.9 µm at position γ, this is greater than the 8.3 µm in the uniform un-deposited 'cold' model and 6.5 µm in the uniformly deposited 'hot' model. The crack width at the bore, shown in Whilst displacements of a magnitude of 5-10 µm might at first sight appear trivial, previous work [6] has shown the importance upon the stress state of pellet fragment displacement of this order. The key difference between a manufacturing tolerance and these displacements is that they are applied during PCMI and after the fuel has been 'conditioned'.…”
Section: Azimuthal Motion Of Pellet Fragmentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This paper investigates the hypothesis that it is the higher temperature that impacts PCMI and not the temperature difference. The effect of the temperature profile was modelled using the PELICAN (r-θ) coupled temperature-displacement finite element model recently developed at Imperial College London for the AGR system [6], [24][25]. PELICAN is a development of Mella and Wenman's (r-z) axisymmetric model [26] and is able to model the r-θ plane of nuclear fuel.…”
Section: Modelling Agr Fuel Performancementioning
confidence: 99%