2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11267-006-9032-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Phosphorus Retention in Lakes and Reservoirs

Abstract: Steady-state models for the prediction of P retention coefficient (R) in lakes were evaluated using data from 93 natural lakes and 119 reservoirs situated in the temperate zone. Most of the already existing models predicted R relatively successfully in lakes while it was seriously under-estimated in reservoirs. A statistical analysis indicated the main causes of differences in R between lakes and reservoirs: (a) distinct relationships between P sedimentation coefficient, depth, and water residence time; (b) ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig. S1, the modelpredicted R TP and R RP values exhibit positive trends with the hydraulic residence time, τ r , as expected from the literature (28)(29)(30). The trends are fitted to the classic Vollenweider model for P sequestration in lakes (Eq.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Fig. S1, the modelpredicted R TP and R RP values exhibit positive trends with the hydraulic residence time, τ r , as expected from the literature (28)(29)(30). The trends are fitted to the classic Vollenweider model for P sequestration in lakes (Eq.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…P retention in lakes and reservoirs correlates with the hydraulic residence time (τ r ) (28)(29)(30). Accordingly, τ r explains more than 45% of the variability of the R TP and R RP values generated by 6,000 Monte Carlo iterations of the P mass balance model.…”
Section: P Retention In Dammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hejzlar et al [2006], Kelly et al [1987], Vollenweider [1975). Limnologists studying phosphorus retention commonly use the Vollenweider equation [1975], which conceptualizes the lake as a continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR) with an effective removal rate constant σ (also referred to as the volumetric rate constant kv,C, [T -1 ]) that can be estimated based on the percent removal R and the mean water residence time ( Table 1).…”
Section: Methods Of Modelling Nutrient Retention In Lentic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with lotic ecosystems, Hejzlar et al [2006] synthesized data to estimate the phosphorus retention of approximately 200 lakes and reservoirs, finding an inverse relationship between the phosphorus removal rate constant and residence time. Similarly, Brainard and Fairchild [2012] studied small constructed ponds and found that the area-specific sediment accumulation rates were inversely proportional to the pond surface area.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and reductions in diffuse sources (Hejzlar et al, 2006;Hoffmann et al, 2009Kronvang et al, 2009a). Such a catchment management plan allows the groundwater threshold value to be higher (average for entire catchment area is 9.3 mg N l −1 ) than in the first scenario.…”
Section: K Hinsby Et Al: Threshold Values and Management Options Fomentioning
confidence: 99%