2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling pile capacity using Gaussian process regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to these two methods of classification, the GPCs approach, as mentioned, is a Cornell classification, which was developed by prior Gaussian's processing functions that were originally for regression [32]. The term Gaussian Process Classifier implements Gaussian processes (GPs) for classification purposes, and more specifically for probabilistic categorization, in which test predictions are categorized as probabilities.…”
Section: Gaussian Process Classification (Gpc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to these two methods of classification, the GPCs approach, as mentioned, is a Cornell classification, which was developed by prior Gaussian's processing functions that were originally for regression [32]. The term Gaussian Process Classifier implements Gaussian processes (GPs) for classification purposes, and more specifically for probabilistic categorization, in which test predictions are categorized as probabilities.…”
Section: Gaussian Process Classification (Gpc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in [Pal, 2010], the author took a different approach and investigated the potential of a Gaussian process (GP) regression techniques to predict the load-bearing capacity of piles. The results from the study indicated improved performance by GP regression in comparison to SVM and empirical relations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other kernelbased regression models, GPR not only provides the estimated value of a variable of interest, but also the variance of computation which can be interpreted as a level of confidence of the model. Though it has some attractive properties beyond ANN and SVM, only recently have a limited number of soft sensor applications of GPR been reported (Chen et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2015;Yu, 2012;Pal and Deswal, 2010;Grbić et al, 2013;Ge et al, 2011). Due to its virtue for nonlinear system modeling, in this study, we are trying for the first time to use GPR to construct a soft sensor modeling of product concentration in glutamate fermentation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-parametric probabilistic models such as a Bayesian framework for Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) have received remarkable attention in the field of machine learning. In comparison to ANN, Gaussian process is easier to understand and fulfill in practice (Pal and Deswal, 2010). GPR models are closely related to SVM as a result of the use of kernel functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%