2003
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling point and diffuse heavy metal emissions and loads in the Elbe basin

Abstract: Abstract:The reduction of pollutant loads in rivers requires a good comprehension of the contribution of all major (point and diffuse) sources in each sub-basin. Due to the sudden change of a centrally planned economy to a free-market economy in 1989, the River Elbe is one of the fastest changing transboundary river basins in Central Europe. The quantification of fluxes of heavy metals in the Elbe basin requires information on the spatial and temporal characteristics of emissions and on physical boundary condi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant proportion of metals washed out from the catchment area accumulate with sediments in the river bottom: On average, ~46% copper, 62% zinc, and 30% manganese. These estimates are in good agreement with the results of HM retention in the Elbe River systems obtained using the METALPOL model [23]: For copper, on average, 51% with a range of variation from 35 to 60% for different tributaries; and for zinc, on average, 45% with a range of variation from 30 to 54%.…”
Section: Description Evaluation and Processing Of Climate Scenario Datasupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A significant proportion of metals washed out from the catchment area accumulate with sediments in the river bottom: On average, ~46% copper, 62% zinc, and 30% manganese. These estimates are in good agreement with the results of HM retention in the Elbe River systems obtained using the METALPOL model [23]: For copper, on average, 51% with a range of variation from 35 to 60% for different tributaries; and for zinc, on average, 45% with a range of variation from 30 to 54%.…”
Section: Description Evaluation and Processing Of Climate Scenario Datasupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Among others, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is widely used for the simulation of river discharge and pollution loads at different scales: From the continental scale [17], through the regional scale [18], to the scale of individual river catchments [19,20]. There is evidence in using semi-distributed models for the evaluation of measures to reduce contaminant loads and improve the ecological status of water bodies in Germany (SWIM, Soil and Water Integrated Model [21]; MONERIS, Modeling Nutrient Emissions in River Systems [22]; METALPOL model [23]) and in Sweden (HYPE, Hydrological Predictions for the Environment [24]) in the framework of the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. In semi-distributed models, the watershed is divided into several subbasins-Hydrological Response Units (HRUs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of estimating heavy-metal emissions via surface and subsurface runoff cannot be solved since there is no method available to measure these heavy-metal fluxes (see also Vink and Peters, 2003). For an accurate pollution survey by indirect diffuse sources in large river basins such as the Elbe, future research should focus on developing measurement and modelling techniques to determine overland fluxes on large scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%