2003
DOI: 10.1051/agro:2002087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Productivity and Nitrate Leaching in a Simulated Dairy Farm

Abstract: -Dairy farmers are faced with the challenge of balancing trade-offs between productivity, and hence profitability, and protection of the environment. An integrated simulation model of the dairy system has been used to explore impacts of varying fertiliser application rates and stocking densities on these trade-offs. The winter requirement for silage was found to be an important determinant of the carrying capacity throughout the year. Increasing fertiliser application rates tends to increase the carrying capac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this definition, the amount of silage in surplus or deficit to requirements and the amount of concentrates fed over several years provides a measure of how close the system is to being a workable system (Fitzgerald et al. , 2005), and this approach is comparable to the concept of winter forage requirement used by Topp and McGechan (2003). When performing a simulation for a particular location, input variables, such as stocking rate, N‐fertilizer application rate and pattern, and silage area, are defined in the initial parameterization using data from the National Dairy Blueprint for well and poorly drained soils (O’Donovan, 2000; O’Loughlin et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this definition, the amount of silage in surplus or deficit to requirements and the amount of concentrates fed over several years provides a measure of how close the system is to being a workable system (Fitzgerald et al. , 2005), and this approach is comparable to the concept of winter forage requirement used by Topp and McGechan (2003). When performing a simulation for a particular location, input variables, such as stocking rate, N‐fertilizer application rate and pattern, and silage area, are defined in the initial parameterization using data from the National Dairy Blueprint for well and poorly drained soils (O’Donovan, 2000; O’Loughlin et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several simulation studies in the Netherlands evaluated N loss from dairy farms using information obtained from De Marke (Hack‐ten Broeke and van der Putten, 1997; Hack‐ten Broeke and de Groot, 1998; Hack‐ten Broeke et al, 1999; Kuipers et al, 1999; ten Berge et al, 2000). Topp and McGechan (2003) extended their Scottish farm model to include N dynamics and then evaluated the impacts of varying fertilizer application rates and stocking densities on nitrate leaching, denitrification losses, and net farm income. Recent work has expanded DAFOSYM to a whole‐farm model with similar emphasis on performance, economic, and environmental issues.…”
Section: Simulation Analysis Of Grassland Farming Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five synoptic weather stations were selected that were representative of the agro-climatic regions of Ireland described by Holden and Brereton (2004). The winter forage requirement is an important determinant of carrying capacity of a farm (Topp and McGechan, 2003) and, for each location, the simulator was used to identify an optimum system by adjusting management parameters in order to obtain the following objectives: a balance between silage production and feed demand, a minimum number of days of winter housing and to maintain grass availability in the grazing area of the farm, limiting the probability of a need to supplement the grazing herd with silage or concentrates. In each case the simulations were run for 30 years using daily weather data stochastically generated from monthly mean values until optimum systems were reached.…”
Section: Analysis Of Regional Management Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%