2017
DOI: 10.5194/tc-11-2137-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling radiative transfer through ponded first-year Arctic sea ice with a plane-parallel model

Abstract: Abstract. Under-ice irradiance measurements were done on ponded first-year pack ice along three transects during the ICE12 expedition north of Svalbard. Bulk transmittances (400-900 nm) were found to be on average 0.15-0.20 under bare ice, and 0.39-0.46 under ponded ice. Radiative transfer modelling was done with a plane-parallel model. While simulated transmittances deviate significantly from measured transmittances close to the edge of ponds, spatially averaged bulk transmittances agree well. That is, transe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the ice bottom, the effect of a different transmittance can be seen within a distance of 2–3 times the ice thickness [ Ehn et al ., ; Petrich et al ., ]. A plane parallel model is not able to capture such effects due to its 1‐D nature [ Taskjelle et al ., ]. Hence, while what happens immediately below the ice is likely well captured by AccuRT except for very close to the boundary between surface types, the discussion of what happens further down the water column may only be valid some longer distance from ice with notably different transmittance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the ice bottom, the effect of a different transmittance can be seen within a distance of 2–3 times the ice thickness [ Ehn et al ., ; Petrich et al ., ]. A plane parallel model is not able to capture such effects due to its 1‐D nature [ Taskjelle et al ., ]. Hence, while what happens immediately below the ice is likely well captured by AccuRT except for very close to the boundary between surface types, the discussion of what happens further down the water column may only be valid some longer distance from ice with notably different transmittance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ profiles of optical properties were made from a heated tent established on the sea ice several hundred meters away from the ship. Profiles of absorption and attenuation coefficients were measured with two different instruments during the drifts of both Floes 3 and 4 [ Taskjelle et al ., ; Pavlov et al ., ]. An a‐Sphere (HOBI Labs, USA) measured absorption ( a (λ), excluding absorption by pure water) between 350 and 750 nm at 1 nm resolution, and an ac‐9 (WET Labs, Philomath, OR, USA) measured absorption ( a (λ), excluding absorption by pure water) and beam attenuation ( c (λ), excluding attenuation by pure water), which is a sum of absorption and scattering at nine distinct wavelengths: 412, 440, 488, 510, 532, 555, 650, 676, and 715 nm (see full list of symbols and units in Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present RTM treats the ice lid, pond water, and underlying ice as parallel layers with uniform IOPs in each layer, which is valid for thin level ice that typically has large and shallow ponds (Webster et al, ). In situ measurements on melt ponds were affected more or less by the uneven pond bottom, and the contrasts at the boundary between ponded and bare ice (Taskjelle et al, ). It departs from the definition of the RTM and contributes to a higher surface albedo in measurements as comparing with the results of the parallel‐layered model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Account was taken of the spectral nature of the problem; however to maintain consistency between the treatment of snow and blue ice the optical properties were linked to effective grain size and a spectral extinction coefficient was calculated on this basis. We also note related studies that investigated the spectral albedo of white sea ice or snow, but not the internal radiative field (Malinka et al, 2016;Gardner andSharp, 2010, Ehn et al, 2011;Taskjelle et al, 2017), or considered internal scattering from a purely theoretical perspective (Malinka, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%