2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-013-1769-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling root–soil interactions using three–dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
213
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
1
213
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This simplification could partly explain the model overestimation of SOC stocks in the 0.0-0.1 m layer of the alleys compared to observed data. This result suggests that it could be useful to couple the CAR-BOSAF model with a model describing root architecture and root growth (Dunbabin et al, 2013;Dupuy et al, 2010), for instance using voxel automata (Mulia et al, 2010). Moreover, the model described a slight increase in SOC stocks in the middle of the alleys rather than close to the trees in the alleys.…”
Section: Representation Of Soc Spatial Heterogeneity In Agroforestrymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This simplification could partly explain the model overestimation of SOC stocks in the 0.0-0.1 m layer of the alleys compared to observed data. This result suggests that it could be useful to couple the CAR-BOSAF model with a model describing root architecture and root growth (Dunbabin et al, 2013;Dupuy et al, 2010), for instance using voxel automata (Mulia et al, 2010). Moreover, the model described a slight increase in SOC stocks in the middle of the alleys rather than close to the trees in the alleys.…”
Section: Representation Of Soc Spatial Heterogeneity In Agroforestrymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this way, models are created that include state-of-the-art knowledge and have significant parameters. There are various root architectural models incorporating a multitude of processes (Dunbabin et al, 2013) that are originally based on Pagès et al (1989) and Diggle (1988). Generally, the parameterization of such models is difficult and demands elaborate experimental effort.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their review discusses the potential of various techniques, including the use of transparent soil, to provide better understanding of root-soil interactions. Other reviews in this field deal with modelling of rhizosphere and plant-soil interactions (Hinsinger et al 2011;Dunbabin et al 2013), mycorrhizae (Treseder 2013), mycorrhizal nitrogen uptake (Hodge and Storer 2015), and transport processes in porous media (Wildenschild and Sheppard 2013). Finally, there is a collection of articles published in edited books (Anderson and Hopmans 2013;Bengough 2012;Timlin and Ahuja 2013) covering issues related to this review, such as neutron and X-ray imaging.…”
Section: Existing Work On Rhizosphere Imaging and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new state of the art approach to modelling rootsoil interaction is based on root system architecture, i.e., models which take into account the specifics of root system architecture at the expense of high computational cost (Dunbabin et al 2013;Ge et al 2000;Pages 2011). While root system architecture has in the past been derived from a range of computational models, it is now possible to measure it in situ (i.e., in the soil) using imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT) and neutron tomography, see Carminati et al (2010); Gregory et al (2003); Koebernick et al (2014);Metzner et al (2015); Mooney et al (2012); Moradi et al (2011);Oswald et al (2008) as a good starting point for the literature.…”
Section: Modelling Rhizosphere Processes: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%