2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling sea level data from China and Malay-Thailand to estimate Holocene ice-volume equivalent sea level change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
97
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
5
97
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lambeck et al, 2014), but small magnitude ice volume changes subsequent to the demise of the Laurentide and Fennoscandian ice sheets around 7 ka are less well constrained (Lambeck et al, 2014;Bradley et al, 2016). Combining GIA modelling with a probabilistic approach, Kopp et al (2009) find that global ice volumes during the Last Interglacial (~125 ka) were at least 6.6 m smaller than present (95% probably; magnitude expressed as sea-level equivalent), but uncertainty associated with the interpretation 485 and dating of sea-level indicators (Düsterhus et al, 2016b;Rovere et al, 2016) and neglect of non-GIA processes still hampers our ability to precisely reconstruct changes in global ice volume during this period.…”
Section: Ice Sheet Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lambeck et al, 2014), but small magnitude ice volume changes subsequent to the demise of the Laurentide and Fennoscandian ice sheets around 7 ka are less well constrained (Lambeck et al, 2014;Bradley et al, 2016). Combining GIA modelling with a probabilistic approach, Kopp et al (2009) find that global ice volumes during the Last Interglacial (~125 ka) were at least 6.6 m smaller than present (95% probably; magnitude expressed as sea-level equivalent), but uncertainty associated with the interpretation 485 and dating of sea-level indicators (Düsterhus et al, 2016b;Rovere et al, 2016) and neglect of non-GIA processes still hampers our ability to precisely reconstruct changes in global ice volume during this period.…”
Section: Ice Sheet Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the absence of RSL databases in our far-field regions, we relied on glacio-isostatic adjustment model predictions to characterize RSL change over the Holocene [33,61]. For each far-field region, we generated sea-level predictions using two GIA models-the ICE-6G_C (VM6) model [33] and the ICE model [61].…”
Section: Regional Rsl and Earthquake Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the absence of RSL databases in our far-field regions, we relied on glacio-isostatic adjustment model predictions to characterize RSL change over the Holocene [33,61]. For each far-field region, we generated sea-level predictions using two GIA models-the ICE-6G_C (VM6) model [33] and the ICE model [61]. The differences in the RSL predictions during the Holocene from these two models is driven predominately by differences in the deglaciation histories of the Antarctic Ice sheet, with a larger total ice-volume equivalent sea-level contribution (26 m versus 13.6 m) [62] and melting continuing until 1 ka (compared to 4 ka) in the Bradley et al [61] model (Online Resource 2).…”
Section: Regional Rsl and Earthquake Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• eustasy, for which we take a reasonable mid range estimate (Bradley et al, 2008(Bradley et al, , 2011);…”
Section: Different Combinations Of Process--responses Between Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%