1994
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7061(94)90087-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling seasonal and long-term dynamics of anions in an acid forest soil, Solling, Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare our modeling results to previous studies on long-term SO42dynamics at other forest sites in the US (e.g., Johnson et al 1993Johnson et al , 1996Johnson et al , 1999Driscoll et al 1998a) and in Europe (Wesselink et al 1994(Wesselink et al , 1995. The specific objectives were to: (1) reconstruct long-term patterns of atmospheric S deposition to the HBEF, (2) simulate the long-term dynamics of S and assess mechanisms contributing to the discrepancy in watershed S mass balances, (3) evaluate the impact of clear-cutting on S dynamics at the HBEF, (4) utilize information on stable S isotope ratios together with the modeled S fluxes to attempt to verify the HBEF S budget, and (5) assess changes in soil fluxes and surface-water chemistry following reductions in atmospheric S deposition.…”
Section: Sulfur (S) Is An Important Element In the Biogeochemistry Ofmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We compare our modeling results to previous studies on long-term SO42dynamics at other forest sites in the US (e.g., Johnson et al 1993Johnson et al , 1996Johnson et al , 1999Driscoll et al 1998a) and in Europe (Wesselink et al 1994(Wesselink et al , 1995. The specific objectives were to: (1) reconstruct long-term patterns of atmospheric S deposition to the HBEF, (2) simulate the long-term dynamics of S and assess mechanisms contributing to the discrepancy in watershed S mass balances, (3) evaluate the impact of clear-cutting on S dynamics at the HBEF, (4) utilize information on stable S isotope ratios together with the modeled S fluxes to attempt to verify the HBEF S budget, and (5) assess changes in soil fluxes and surface-water chemistry following reductions in atmospheric S deposition.…”
Section: Sulfur (S) Is An Important Element In the Biogeochemistry Ofmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We considered a single soil compartment of 50 cm with a constant water input flux of 70 cm/yr, a drainage flux of 35 cm/yr (19), a CEC of 250 kequivlha (Z), an initial base saturation of 5%, and a gibbsite solubility constant (pKa(0~)3) of -8.7 (40). Still, we chose model parameters representative for the Solling spruce site to conceptualize soil chemical responses to changes in atmospheric deposition and the time scales of these responses for the Solling case study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The litter layer was not a significant source contributing sulphates to the soil solution. Also the release of organically bound sulphur from the mineral soil seems unlikely, as resources of organic sulphur are rather low [80]. That is why the contribution of sulphate to forest floors is primarily of anthropogenic origin, in the form of deposition with precipitation.…”
Section: Anionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large role in sulphate retention is played by reactions of surface adsorption, hence an important parameter is the specific surface of the soil. Soils of glacial origin have a small specific surface and therefore an alternative description for sulphate retention and release in forest soils under conditions of high sulphur deposition could be the formation and dissolution of the mineral jurbanite [80]. Due to their adsorption properties, sulphates are retained in the soil and migrate rather slowly.…”
Section: Anionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation