2010
DOI: 10.1080/00221681003726288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling secondary cells and sediment transport in rectangular channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quite remarkably, little sand deposited near the flume centerline. Although we have no data to support this hypothesis, this may be the result of a nonuniform distribution of bed shear stress and the existence of secondary currents (McLean, 1981;Omran & Knight, 2010). During the first sand pulse (Figure 5d), deposition represented a volume of sand reaching 143 cm 3 (or 371 g).…”
Section: Pulse Transportmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Quite remarkably, little sand deposited near the flume centerline. Although we have no data to support this hypothesis, this may be the result of a nonuniform distribution of bed shear stress and the existence of secondary currents (McLean, 1981;Omran & Knight, 2010). During the first sand pulse (Figure 5d), deposition represented a volume of sand reaching 143 cm 3 (or 371 g).…”
Section: Pulse Transportmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Other studies based on the Shiono and Knight method can be found in Liao and Knight (2007), Tang and Knight (2008) and Omran and Knight (2010). Apart from SKM, some other methods for analysing the conveyance capacity of compound channels have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of detailed data about the distribution of the friction factor (f) across the cross section of the channel, an overall friction factor could be used for each panel (Omran and Knight 2010). f was therefore computed from the corresponding Manning's coefficient (n) and applied as a constant in main channel and floodplain panels.…”
Section: Calibration For Skm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%