2001
DOI: 10.1007/s100640100126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling self-weight consolidation in Holocene sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no commonly accepted methodology that is used to correct sea-level index points for autocompaction (e.g., Pizzuto and Schwendt, 1997;Paul and Barras, 1998;Rybczyk et al, 1998;Tovey and Paul, 2002;Williams, 2003;Bird et al, 2004;Massey et al, 2006b;Edwards, 2006). This is in part due to the lack of geotechnical models capable of dealing with the complex stratigraphies found in coastal sediments (Allen, 1999;Massey et al, 2006b;Shennan et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is no commonly accepted methodology that is used to correct sea-level index points for autocompaction (e.g., Pizzuto and Schwendt, 1997;Paul and Barras, 1998;Rybczyk et al, 1998;Tovey and Paul, 2002;Williams, 2003;Bird et al, 2004;Massey et al, 2006b;Edwards, 2006). This is in part due to the lack of geotechnical models capable of dealing with the complex stratigraphies found in coastal sediments (Allen, 1999;Massey et al, 2006b;Shennan et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Numerical models represent valuable tools useful for understanding and predicting peat compaction at a range of spatial and temporal resolutions. Existing models allow calculating syn‐depositional compaction in aggrading successions of different composition [e.g., Paul and Barras , 1998; Tovey and Paul , 2002; Meckel et al , 2007]. But, like many other peat compaction models (for an overview see van Asselen et al [2009]) these models have critical shortcomings considering their application to Holocene fluvial‐deltaic settings containing peat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sediment subsamples of known (dry) weight were burned at 550˚C for 4 h to calculate the percentage of organic mass loss. Bulk density was calculated to reconstruct stratigraphic changes through the core and detect possible auto compaction through overburden (Tovey and Paul, 2002;Brain et al, 2011). Sand content was also measured following Barnett et al (2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%