2021
DOI: 10.1007/s42488-021-00047-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling sequence decision inventory management problem under fuzzy environment

Abstract: This study considers a specific inventory management problem, where a retailer could arrange a series of sequential orders, and the next order is arranged after the yield of present stage is known. For this matter, a credibilistic dynamic programming model is formulated under uncertain supply and demand, and the mean cost convex programming model of each ordering stage is derived. The goal is to obtain the optimal order quantity at each stage under the uncertain supply and demand that are represented by fuzzy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For future work, we plan to integrate aspects such as inventory or location into MDVRP modelling, for hazmat transportation. We will consider more realistic factors, e.g., evacuations (Yang, Liu and Yang 2020) during the process of hazmat transportation, more efficient algorithm (Vidal et al 2012;Zhang, Liu, and Lim 2015;Achamu, Berhan and Geremaw 2021), and analyse hazmat transportation risk using flexible mathematical programming models such as credibilistic programming (Li 2013;Tian and Guo 2021) or stochastic programming (Long, Szeto, and Ding 2019;Ma et al 2021). As the number of attributes that require addressing increases, it would be interesting to investigate how attribute evaluation techniques (Li et al 2018) may be utilised to prioritise the sequence in which different attributes are considered, to raise the efficiency of the overall modelling and solution process.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For future work, we plan to integrate aspects such as inventory or location into MDVRP modelling, for hazmat transportation. We will consider more realistic factors, e.g., evacuations (Yang, Liu and Yang 2020) during the process of hazmat transportation, more efficient algorithm (Vidal et al 2012;Zhang, Liu, and Lim 2015;Achamu, Berhan and Geremaw 2021), and analyse hazmat transportation risk using flexible mathematical programming models such as credibilistic programming (Li 2013;Tian and Guo 2021) or stochastic programming (Long, Szeto, and Ding 2019;Ma et al 2021). As the number of attributes that require addressing increases, it would be interesting to investigate how attribute evaluation techniques (Li et al 2018) may be utilised to prioritise the sequence in which different attributes are considered, to raise the efficiency of the overall modelling and solution process.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%