2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-05714-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling, simulation and experimental validation of the milling operation of titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The feasible combination of the process parameters was done using the Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The choice of the RSM was based on its ability to iteratively study the cross-effect of process parameters [33][34][35]. The numerical experimentation comprises a four factor experimental design, which varied at different levels in the following ranges; feed rate (250 − 350 mm/rev), spindle speed (1000 − 3000 rpm), cutting speed (100 − 300 m/min) and depth of cut (0.3 − 0.9 mm).…”
Section: The Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feasible combination of the process parameters was done using the Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The choice of the RSM was based on its ability to iteratively study the cross-effect of process parameters [33][34][35]. The numerical experimentation comprises a four factor experimental design, which varied at different levels in the following ranges; feed rate (250 − 350 mm/rev), spindle speed (1000 − 3000 rpm), cutting speed (100 − 300 m/min) and depth of cut (0.3 − 0.9 mm).…”
Section: The Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guidelines for the bearings for jet engines were considered for the identification of the product's properties in relation to the service requirements [32]. The emphasis on the Ti-6Al-4V alloy is due to its main features, which are light weight, high strength (yield strength of approximately 1000 MPa), high temperature characteristics (maximum melting point for grade 5 is at 1933 K), thermal processability, fracture toughness, workability, and superior formability [33][34][35][36]. This alloy is currently the most preferred for aircraft manufacturing owing to its theo- retical chemical composition properties, good hightemperature properties and high strength-to-weight ratio [37,38].…”
Section: Mesh Generation and Geometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validation of the numerical experiments was done via physical experiments as well as the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The indicators for determining the validity of a numerical experiments include the: "p-value Prob > F" (which should be less than 0.050), "Lack of Fit" (which should be statistically insignificant compared to the pure error) as well as the correlation coefficients, namely the predicted R square, R squared and the adjusted R Squared (which should be close to 1) for a statistically significant model [39].…”
Section: Optimization Of the Conversion Processmentioning
confidence: 99%