2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling soil carbon sequestration of intensively monitored forest plots in Europe by three different approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased supplies of plant available N from deposition may stimulate tree growth and litter fall and result in increased biomass production and, consequently, additional C sequestration [186][187][188] as, for example, in a fragmented landscape with a higher forest edge density. This elevated forest productivity has been hypothesized to increase soil organic C stocks by increasing the C input to the soil and by reducing the decomposition of soil organic matter.…”
Section: Global Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased supplies of plant available N from deposition may stimulate tree growth and litter fall and result in increased biomass production and, consequently, additional C sequestration [186][187][188] as, for example, in a fragmented landscape with a higher forest edge density. This elevated forest productivity has been hypothesized to increase soil organic C stocks by increasing the C input to the soil and by reducing the decomposition of soil organic matter.…”
Section: Global Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This offers many options for integrated evaluations of soil data with other temporal assessments on the same plots such as crown condition, foliar chemistry, or tree growth, allowing in-depth analyses with mechanistic models (e.g. van der Salm et al 2007;Reinds et al 2008;Jochheim et al 2009;Mol Dijkstra et al 2009) in order to better understand cause-effect relationships in forest processes and responses to environmental impacts (Lorenz and Fischer 2013).…”
Section: Potentiality Of Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available forest simulators provide a large array of outputs, ranging from growing stock and yield related variables to quantification of important ecosystem services, such as carbon sequestration in biomass and soil, water recharge, etc. (García Quijano et al, 2005;Mol Dijkstra et al, 2009;Gilliams et al, 2005) but are not capable of generating the whole indicator set required by SFM standards. Nevertheless every model is able to generate at least a few indicators covering one or more sustainability principles (e.g.…”
Section: Addressing Trade-offs Between Forest Ecosystem Services Withmentioning
confidence: 99%