2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2008.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling soil physical behaviour with particular reference to soil science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil environment is influenced by the state of three soil phases (solid, liquid and gaseous) and by a complex equilibrium among them, within which a number of different physical and chemical processes control the mechanical behavior of the soil (Richards & Peth, 2009). The mechanical property of soil in loading and unloading presents an elastic and plastic deformation with a nonlinear variation (Upadhyaya et al, 2002).The comprehensive expression of the stress-strain behavior of agricultural soils is complex and difficult to describe with a simple relationship.…”
Section: Soil Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil environment is influenced by the state of three soil phases (solid, liquid and gaseous) and by a complex equilibrium among them, within which a number of different physical and chemical processes control the mechanical behavior of the soil (Richards & Peth, 2009). The mechanical property of soil in loading and unloading presents an elastic and plastic deformation with a nonlinear variation (Upadhyaya et al, 2002).The comprehensive expression of the stress-strain behavior of agricultural soils is complex and difficult to describe with a simple relationship.…”
Section: Soil Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson and Burt, 1990;Koolen et al, 1992;Lamandé et al, 2007). Richards and Peth (2009) reported large effects of the soil stiffness of a 20 cm thick plough pan on stress propagation. However, Lamandé and Schjønning (in press-a) reported that the stiffness of a relatively thin (5 cm) plough pan, although higher than that of the underlying soil, was of the same order of magnitude as in the underlying soil.…”
Section: Theoretical Evaluation Of the Upper Model Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Rigidity may possibly be valid for fractured rocks system [e.g., Peters and Klavetter, 1988;Therrien and Sudicky, 1996;MacQuarrie and Mayer, 2005]; however, in most natural soils the pore system is dynamically changing due to swelling and shrinkage depending on the water contents and due to soil biota activities among other factors [e.g., Horn, 2004;Richards and Peth, 2009]. Such changes in pore volume and pore size distribution including deformations in pore geometry result in the occurrence of separate porosity compartments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%