“…This effect is likely because, in higher population areas, church forest expansion over time has been largely through the planting of non-native trees for commercial or construction reasons, most often Eucalyptus trees (Cardelús et al, 2017;Liang et al, 2016;Orlowska & Klepeis, 2018;Reynolds, Collins, et al, 2017). On the one hand, this expansion may indicate that forests may be resilient to population pressures even as population pressures convert other vegetation and scrubland into cropland and housing (Birhanu et al, 2021;Gebrehiwot et al, 2021), which is consistent with evidence that church forest areas have been resilient over time (Ashenafi & Leader-Williams, 2005;Cardelús et al, 2017;Sahle et al, 2021;Scull et al, 2017). On the other hand, Eucalyptus planting can contribute to native forest degradation and thus exhibit a tradeoff between commercial and ecological value that is masked by forest area (Cardelús et al, 2017;Liang et al, 2016).…”