2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.08.249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling stomatal conductance of wheat: An assessment of response relationships under elevated CO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, previous and current studies showed elevated CO 2 increased RWC (Fig. 1) by reducing the stomatal and mesophyll conductance and transpiration (Zong and Shangguan 2014;Houshmandfar et al 2015;Sekhar et al 2015). A s a result, the tissue dehydration was alleviated, and the C uploading in phloem was enhanced.…”
Section: Elevated Co 2 Enhances the C Supply For New Leaf Growth And contrasting
confidence: 58%
“…In contrast, previous and current studies showed elevated CO 2 increased RWC (Fig. 1) by reducing the stomatal and mesophyll conductance and transpiration (Zong and Shangguan 2014;Houshmandfar et al 2015;Sekhar et al 2015). A s a result, the tissue dehydration was alleviated, and the C uploading in phloem was enhanced.…”
Section: Elevated Co 2 Enhances the C Supply For New Leaf Growth And contrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Monthly averaged stomata conductance ( g s ) (mol m −2 s −1 ) under a[CO 2 ] (open circles) and e[CO 2 ] (filled circles) estimated using a Jarvis‐type model developed at this site (Houshmandfar et al ) (A). Cumulative transpiration estimates (± se ) from germination until DC31, DC34, DC65 and DC69 in wheat grown under FACE conditions (a[CO 2 ]: open squares; e[CO 2 ]: filled squares) (B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yitpi and cv. Scout) (Houshmandfar et al 2015a). Stomatal conductance was on average 27% lower under elevated than under ambient CO 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In apparent contrast, using a Jarvis‐type g s model, which uses independent empirical response functions to multiple environmental factors, Houshmandfar et al . () found that stomata of e[CO 2 ]‐grown wheat responded less sensitively to drying soil, i.e . stomatal closure was initiated earlier – at higher soil water content – under ambient [CO 2 ] than under e[CO 2 ].…”
Section: Acclimation To Co2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to compare these results directly because the Jarvis‐type model employed by Houshmandfar et al . () uses relative functions (with values between 0 and 1) to scale a maximum (unstressed) conductance ( g max ). In accordance with most other studies, e[CO 2 ] significantly depressed g max in the first place, so that a less sensitive response from this lower g max to drying soil can lead to similar absolute conductance as a more sensitive (stronger) response starting from a larger g max value under ambient [CO 2 ].…”
Section: Acclimation To Co2mentioning
confidence: 99%