Modelling structured societies: A multi-relational approach to context permeability

Abstract

The structure of social relations is fundamental for the construction of plausible simulation scenarios. It shapes the way actors interact and create their identity within overlapping social contexts. Each actor interacts in multiple contexts within different types of social relations that constitute their social space. In this article, we present an approach to model structured agent societies with multiple coexisting social networks. We study the notion of context permeability, using a game in which agents try to achieve global consensus. We design and analyse two different models of permeability. In the first model, agents interact concurrently in multiple social networks. In the second, we introduce a context switching mechanism which adds a dynamic temporal component to agent interaction in the model. Agents switch between the different networks spending more or less time in each one. We compare these models and analyse the influence of different social networks regarding the speed of convergence to consensus. We conduct a series of experiments that show the impact of different configurations for coexisting social networks. This approach unveils both the limitations of the current modelling approaches and possible research directions for complex social space simulations.

Understanding Homophily and More-Becomes-More Through Adaptive Temporal-Causal Network Models

“…Yet another difference is that in the current paper the data both for alcohol and for smoking have been considered, whereas in [11] only the data for alcohol were considered. For further refinements of the model, also more specific models for the contagion effects can be included, for example using inspiration from [13].…”

Generational political dynamics of retirement pensions systems: An agent based model

“…To model their beliefs agents are classified into three categories: one minority that adopts quasi-optimal behavior, another minority that adopts random behavior, and a majority of agents who mimic members of their social networks [2], social circles [12,11] or contexts [19].…”

Optimizing group learning: An evolutionary computing approach

“…Thus, the question to be investigated is how members of a research group should update on the receipt of new evidence in a social setting, where they also have access to relevant beliefs of (some or all of) their colleagues, supposing the group wants to strike the best balance between speed (getting at the truth fast) and accuracy (minimizing error rates). The main methodological tool to be used is that of computational agent-based modelling, which has become a central topic in artificial intelligence (Shoham, Powers, & Grenager, 2007;Tamargo, Garcia, Falappa, & Simari, 2014;Nunes & Antunes, 2015;Gottifredi et al, 2018). Specifically, we build on the well-known Hegselmann-Krause (HK) model for studying opinion dynamics in groups of interacting agents focused on a common research question (Hegselmann & Krause, 2002, 2005, 2009; for related models, see Deffuant et al, 2000;Dittmer, 2001;Weisbuch et al, 2002;Pluchino, Latora, & Rapisarda, 2006;Semeshenko, Gordon, & Nadal, 2008;De Langhe & Greiff, 2010).…”