1983
DOI: 10.1357/002224083788519759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the advection of vertically migrating shrimp larvae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with the results of Rothlisberg et al (1983) who showed that the introduction of wind into their larval advection model had little effect on either the distance or direction of larval movement. The model also predicts that the potential for advection of larvae towards the Norman River is higher during the winter-spring months from May to November than during the summer-autumn months from December to April.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is consistent with the results of Rothlisberg et al (1983) who showed that the introduction of wind into their larval advection model had little effect on either the distance or direction of larval movement. The model also predicts that the potential for advection of larvae towards the Norman River is higher during the winter-spring months from May to November than during the summer-autumn months from December to April.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…More recently, seasonal changes in the advection of larvae from spawning areas to inshore nursery areas have been described. Rothlisberg et al (1983) have demonstrated that seasonal changes in the timing of tidal currents relative to the timing of vertical migratory behaviour of penaeid larvae results in a different seasonal pattern of postlarval immigration in different areas of the Gulf of Carpentaria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of density stratification, which cause vertical variations in eddy viscosity, are not therefore included and the model should be used with great caution in such circumstances. Rothlisberg et al (1983) have used a model similar to that described above in a study of shrimp larvae migration in wind-driven and tidal currents in the Gulf of Carpentaria, northern Australia. Vertical current structure was derived from a model by Jordan & Baker (1980), of which the Prandle model may be regarded as a special case.…”
Section: Non-linear Velocity Shearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, selective tidal transport has been proposed as a mechanism capable of producing net horizontal movement (Cronin and Forward 1982;Hill1991a, 1991bHill1991a, and 1994Rothlisberg et al 1983;Thi鈧琤ault et al 1992), though no conclusive evidence supporting this mechanism has been collected for inner-shelf larval species. Pressure can serve as a synchronizing cue for larval response to a semidiurnal tide (M 2 , 12.4 hr;Knight-Jones 1966;Marsden 1994); however, a synchronizing cue for larval response to the diurnal tide (in the presence of a stronger semidiurnal tide) is less clear.…”
Section: Biological and Physical Processes Influencing Vertical Distrmentioning
confidence: 99%