2012 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/wowmom.2012.6263748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the delay distribution of Binary Spray and Wait routing protocol

Abstract: This article proposes a stochastic model to obtain the end-to-end delay law between two nodes of a Delay Tolerant Network (DTN). We focus on the commonly used Binary Spray and Wait (BSW) routing protocol and propose a model that can be applied to homogeneous or heterogeneous networks (i.e. when the inter-contact law parameter takes one or several values). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first model allowing to estimate the delay distribution of Binary Spray and Wait DTN protocol in heterogeneous netw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although SnW allows every node to forward the content copies, the copies will not over consume much resources due to limited maximum number of copies. Besides, Diana et al and other researchers extended the Markovian model to more realistic cases where mobile nodes have heterogeneous mobility models [23], [24].…”
Section: B Delay Tolerant Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although SnW allows every node to forward the content copies, the copies will not over consume much resources due to limited maximum number of copies. Besides, Diana et al and other researchers extended the Markovian model to more realistic cases where mobile nodes have heterogeneous mobility models [23], [24].…”
Section: B Delay Tolerant Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth pointing out that both [11] and [24] only produce a mean end-to-end delay without further investigating on the influences of other factors, such as content lifetime, etc. Moreover, only one-way transmission is modelled in [11], [23], [24] to reflect that one node sends a content to another node. When considering ICNs, data transmission normally composes of both requesting and responding phases, which has been overlooked by above mentioned works.…”
Section: B Delay Tolerant Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous analytical treatments to DTNs, e.g., [2], [6], have mostly been dealing with Markovian models using states monitoring the number of copies of a message. Previous studies have pointed out that joint factors such as random motions of nodes and their short transmission ranges, the inter-arrival time of messages in a DTN displays Poisson distributions [2].…”
Section: Capacity Estimation Of Dtnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for 2-hop and unlimited multi-copy routers [2], [3], [4], and for Spray-and-Wait [5], [6]. These deal mostly with Markovian models using states monitoring the number of copies of a message.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pioneering work in the field of DTN performance modeling was [3], where the authors provide a Markov model for the 2-hop and unrestricted multicopy routing protocols in the case of homogeneous exponentially distributed intercontact times (ICTs). Markov modeling was subsequently applied to Epidemic routing [4]- [6], Spray And Wait [7], [8] and Binary Spray and Wait [9]. Other modeling tools include Ordinary Differential Equations [10], [11] or Petri Nets [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%