Modelling the dynamics of signalling pathways

Abstract

In the present chapter we discuss methodologies for the modelling, calibration and validation of cellular signalling pathway dynamics. The discussion begins with the typical range of techniques for modelling that might be employed to go from the chemical kinetics to a mathematical model of biochemical pathways. In particular, we consider the decision-making processes involved in selecting the right mechanism and level of detail of representation of the biochemical interactions. These include the choice between (i) deterministic and stochastic chemical kinetics representations, (ii) discrete and continuous time models and (iii) representing continuous and discrete state processes. We then discuss the task of calibrating the models using information available in web-based databases. For situations in which the data are not available from existing sources we discuss model calibration based upon measured data and system identification methods. Such methods, together with mathematical modelling databases and computational tools, are often available in standard packages. We therefore make explicit mention of a range of popular and useful sites. As an example of the whole modelling and calibration process, we discuss a study of the cross-talk between the IL-1 (interleukin-1)-stimulated NF-kappaB (nuclear factor kappaB) pathway and the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor beta)-stimulated Smad2 pathway.

Real time simulation for computational surgery: a review

“…But simulation at a gene regulatory network level is a challenge in itself. This is so since at this level a stochastic description of the reactions occurring within the cell must be done, since it is nonsense to speak of concentration at this level, where only few specimens of each component are present [9,92,93]. It is commonly accepted that under some weak hypothesis (well stirred mixture, fixed volume and temperature), the system can be considered as Markovian, and can be consequently modeled by the so-called Chemical Master Equation (CME), [94], which is in fact no more than an ordinary differential equations stating the conservation of the probability density function P in time:…”

Real-time in silico experiments on gene regulatory networks and surgery simulation on handheld devices

“…In this situation, the continuum approach itself is questioned, as justified clearly in the excellent review by Turner et al [26] and references therein. Here, the concept of concentration of the species does not make sense [6,27]. On the contrary, under some weak hypothesis (well-stirred mixture, fixed volume, and temperature), the system can be considered as Markovian and can be consequently modeled by the so-called Chemical Master Equation (CME), [28], which is in fact no more than a set of ordinary differential equations stating the conservation of the probability density function P in time:…”

A Framework for Modeling the Relationship Between Cellular Steady-state and Stimulus-responsiveness

“…Such systems are more appropriately modeled using reaction diffusion equations, reviewed in Slepchenko et al ., 2002. A second assumption of the rate equation is that the concentration of each participating species is sufficiently “large” (Sreenath et al ., 2008). If this is not the case, then random fluctuations can no longer be ignored and the reaction velocity must be modeled by a propensity function, called the chemical master equation (Gillespie, 1992).…”