Modelling the Flow Behaviour of Al Alloy Sheets at Elevated Temperatures Using a Modified Zerilli–Armstrong Model and Phenomenological-Based Constitutive Models

Abstract

The flow behaviour of AA2060 Al alloy under warm/hot deformation conditions is complicated because of its dependency on strain rates (ε˙), strain (ε), and deformation modes. Thus, it is crucial to reveal and predict the flow behaviours of this alloy at a wide range of temperatures (T) and ε˙ using different constitutive models. Firstly, the isothermal tensile tests were carried out via a Gleeble-3800 thermomechanical simulator at a T range of 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 °C and ε˙ range of 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 s−1 to reveal the warm/hot flow behaviours of AA2060 alloy sheet. Consequently, three phenomenological-based constitutive models (L-MJC, S1-MJC, S2-MJC) and a modified Zerilli–Armstrong (MZA) model representing physically based constitutive models were developed to precisely predict the flow behaviour of AA2060 alloy sheet under a wide range of T and ε˙. The predictability of the developed constitutive models was assessed and compared using various statistical parameters, including the correlation coefficient (R), average absolute relative error (AARE), and root mean square error (RMSE). By comparing the results determined from these models and those obtained from experimentations, and confirmed by R, AARE, and RMSE values, it is concluded that the predicted stresses determined from the S2-MJC model align closely with the experimental stresses, demonstrating a remarkable fit compared to the S1-MJC, L-MJC, and MZA models. This is because of the linking impact between softening, the strain rate, and strain hardening in the S2-MJC model. It is widely known that the dislocation process is affected by softening and strain rates. This is attributed to the interactions that occurred between ε and ε˙ from one side and between ε, ε˙, and T from the other side using an extensive set of constants correlating the constitutive components of dynamic recovery and softening mechanisms.

Impact of the tool shoulder diameter to pin diameter ratio and welding speed on the performance of friction sir-welded AA7075-T651 Al alloy butt joints

“…Research made by [39][40][41][42][43][44] calculates the total energy and power used during FSW. Emam et al [39] refine the model for calculating energy depending on using two mains sources of energy, the first energy coming from friction and the second energy from plastic deformation.…”