2001
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112001004815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the formation of shoreface-connected sand ridges on storm-dominated inner shelves

Abstract: A morphodynamic model is developed and analysed to gain fundamental understanding of the basic physical mechanisms responsible for the characteristics of shorefaceconnected sand ridges observed in some coastal seas. These alongshore rhythmic bed forms have a horizontal lengthscale of order 5 km and are related to the mean current along the coast: the seaward ends of their crests are shifted upstream with respect to where they are attached to the shoreface. The model is based on the two-dimensional shallow wate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
80
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the swales in the exposed Holocene transgressive surface would also be expected to migrate as the ravinement surface is exposed at the seafloor and subjected to erosion, albeit at a lower rate than the sand ridge migration; the mobile modern sediment (sand ridges) is migrating over a lessmobile substrate. Nonetheless, interpretation of southwest migration of these ridges is consistent with models of shoreface-connected ridge migration rates of 1 to 10 m/yr in energy environments similar to southern Long Island (Trowbridge, 1995;Calvette et al, 2001;and Vis-Star et al, 2007) and similar to rates of sand ridge movement recognized offshore of the Outer Banks, NC (Thieler et al, 2013).…”
Section: Erosion Of the Inner-continental Shelf Offshore Of Western Fsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the swales in the exposed Holocene transgressive surface would also be expected to migrate as the ravinement surface is exposed at the seafloor and subjected to erosion, albeit at a lower rate than the sand ridge migration; the mobile modern sediment (sand ridges) is migrating over a lessmobile substrate. Nonetheless, interpretation of southwest migration of these ridges is consistent with models of shoreface-connected ridge migration rates of 1 to 10 m/yr in energy environments similar to southern Long Island (Trowbridge, 1995;Calvette et al, 2001;and Vis-Star et al, 2007) and similar to rates of sand ridge movement recognized offshore of the Outer Banks, NC (Thieler et al, 2013).…”
Section: Erosion Of the Inner-continental Shelf Offshore Of Western Fsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…As the ridges grow in amplitude, they undergo alongshore, down-current migration, while at the same time the eroding shoreface retreats out from under them. A widely cited theory of origin and maintenance of shorefaceattached sand ridges is that of Trowbridge (1995), modified by Calvette et al (2001) and Vis-Star et al (2007), who used stability analysis to show that sand ridges can be created, maintained, and enhanced during storm-driven alongshore-directed flow. Fig.…”
Section: Erosion Of the Inner-continental Shelf Offshore Of Western Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach commonly adopted to study the initial growth of a pattern is linear stability analysis which has already been successfully applied to describe the formation of various features at different scales ranging from ripples (Blondeaux 1990) to offshore patterns like sand waves (Hulscher, De Swart & De Vriend 1993) and shoreface-connected ridges (Calvete et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calibration parameter in this framework is γ c and is adjusted to maintain an order of magnitude difference between the two terms on the right-hand side of Eq. (4), similar to the methodology of Calvete et al (2001). For all experiments in this contribution, γ c = 0.07.…”
Section: Hybrid Sorted Bedform Model Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that this mismatch, coupled with the strong forcing condition that is required to move sediment in the model (i.e., large U w ), has lead to a smaller permissible parameter space where the morphodynamic term and the new GP derived predictor are interoperable. We define the permissible parameter space by the scaling argument made previously by Calvete et al (2001): γ c should be set to a value that maintains the ratio between the two terms on the right side of Eq. (4) to ∼ 1 order of magnitude.…”
Section: Hybrid Sorted Bedform Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%