2020
DOI: 10.5194/bg-17-5693-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the habitat preference of two key <i>Sphagnum</i> species in a poor fen as controlled by capitulum water content

Abstract: Abstract. Current peatland models generally treat vegetation as static, although plant community structure is known to alter as a response to environmental change. Because the vegetation structure and ecosystem functioning are tightly linked, realistic projections of peatland response to climate change require the inclusion of vegetation dynamics in ecosystem models. In peatlands, Sphagnum mosses are key engineers. Moss community composition primarily follows habitat moisture conditions. The known species habi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike for the vascular plants, there are no established set of traits for Sphagnum mosses. Therefore, we selected such properties that our recent study linked to the capacity to remain moist and, consequently, to photosynthesize (Gong et al, 2020). We defined the following Sphagnum traits: stand density (number of shoots cm −2 ), capitulum width (cap_width, mm) and dry weight (cap_dw, mg), fascicle density (number cm −1 ), capitulum dry matter content (CDMC, mg/g), capitulum water content (cap_wc, g/g) and capitulum C and N contents and C:N ratio.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike for the vascular plants, there are no established set of traits for Sphagnum mosses. Therefore, we selected such properties that our recent study linked to the capacity to remain moist and, consequently, to photosynthesize (Gong et al, 2020). We defined the following Sphagnum traits: stand density (number of shoots cm −2 ), capitulum width (cap_width, mm) and dry weight (cap_dw, mg), fascicle density (number cm −1 ), capitulum dry matter content (CDMC, mg/g), capitulum water content (cap_wc, g/g) and capitulum C and N contents and C:N ratio.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The release of nutrients after WLD does not apply to the Sphagnum mosses that lack a rooting system and which are therefore more dependent on nutrients in the surface runoff water. Furthermore, Sphagnum photosynthesis and growth are both dependent on the capitulum moisture content (Gong et al, 2020; Jassey & Signarbieux, 2019). Therefore, for Sphagnum mosses, we hypothesize that WLD will increase resource conservatism (Figure 1), although this effect could be offset if WLD increases the surface density of the moss layer, as it is the main mechanism for Sphagnum mosses to avoid desiccation (Clymo & Hayward, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is only a matter of time before peatland ecosystem models (e.g., [74][75][76]) become adapted for 3D spatially explicit input. Fine-scale microtopographic ecohydrological structures that can be represented from either UAS SfM or LiDAR would provide the resolution needed for models to quantify how peatland structure and function changes over time [67], which can lead to insights into the ecohydrological feedbacks [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%