2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the impact of climate change on flow and E. coli concentration in the catchment of an ungauged drinking water source in Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports the estimated future increase in all indicator concentrations as well as colour in the winter season in the West, and the decrease in the colour in summer in all regions, when the effect from changing runoff is included. A model study of a Norwegian catchment indicates lower future concentrations of E. coli in summer due to reduced runoff (Mohammed et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This supports the estimated future increase in all indicator concentrations as well as colour in the winter season in the West, and the decrease in the colour in summer in all regions, when the effect from changing runoff is included. A model study of a Norwegian catchment indicates lower future concentrations of E. coli in summer due to reduced runoff (Mohammed et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies focused on assessing the impacts of environmental changes on runoff [26,27,61,63]. Investigating the effects of environmental changes on runoff usually involves the application of hydrologic models [64,65]. The choice of a hydrological model may have an impact on the final assessment results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major sources of uncertainties include the historical observations of the weather variables used in both the previous hydrological models and the hydrodynamic model, the climate projections, as well as the model formulations and their calibrations in this study. While uncertainties in the predicted stream flow and E. coli numbers were accounted for in the previous hydrological model [49] that provided additional inputs for this study, the number of discharge points (streams) included in the model was only a small fraction of the tributaries, most of which are either transient or cannot be easily assessed for regular sampling due to the steep topography. Thus, discharges from those sections could be higher both presently and, in the future, potentially affecting the numbers that reach the raw water intake zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the catchment of the lake is completely ungauged. Therefore, to account for inflows and microbial discharges from various streams surrounding the lake, results of hydrological and water quality models previously calibrated for the major streams (manuscript submitted) [49] were used as inputs to the hydrodynamic model in this study. The hydrological and water quality models were based on sub-catchments using a soil and water quality modeling tool (SWAT).…”
Section: Hydrological Flows Into the Lakementioning
confidence: 99%