2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2210.08888
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the impact of repeat asymptomatic testing policies for staff on SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential

Abstract: COVID-19 Modelling Group 2 , Ian Hall • Model of SARS-CoV-2 test sensitivity and infectiousness based on data freely available in the literature • Simple, efficient algorithm for simulating testing in a heterogeneous population • Regular lateral flow tests have a similar impact on transmission to PCR tests • Adherence behaviour is crucial to actual testing impact • Regular testing reduces the size and likelihood of outbreaks in closed populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm to generate individual viral load and infectiousness profiles is described in further detail in Supplementary Text S2 and in [33] is available at [34]. The method is detailed in [25] and summarised in Supplementary Text S1.3.…”
Section: Individual Characteristics: Viral Load Infectiousness and Te...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The algorithm to generate individual viral load and infectiousness profiles is described in further detail in Supplementary Text S2 and in [33] is available at [34]. The method is detailed in [25] and summarised in Supplementary Text S1.3.…”
Section: Individual Characteristics: Viral Load Infectiousness and Te...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, considering the relative low cost of LFDs, this suggests that they are a better option for mass testing [37]. Note this estimate for the sensitivity of LFD antigen tests is based on estimates sensitivity in phase 3b testing in [18] adjusted for the relative error induced by self vs. trained swabbing (see [25] for further details).…”
Section: Impact Of Mass Testing On Point-source Outbreaksmentioning
confidence: 99%