2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2017.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the impact of targeted anthelmintic treatment of cattle on dung fauna

Abstract: HighlightsAssessment of the impact of anthelmintic targeted selected treatment on invertebrates.Practical risk matrix to assess the impact of treatment programs.Novel approach to life cycle modelling of invertebrates.Targeted selective treatment mitigates ecological impact of anthelmintics via refugia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Side-effects of anthelmintics as a consequence of 'leakage' into the environment, such as on non-target fauna [30] and onward impacts on their ecology and ecosystem service provision [31] need to be better understood and balanced against the beneficial impacts of treatment. The direct costs of anthelmintic resistance include the cost of the ineffective drug, the labour wastage in administering the ineffective drug, and the failure of adequate control leading to reduced production of meat and milk on a per hectare and per animal basis.…”
Section: Costing Environmental Impacts Of Drugs and Drug Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Side-effects of anthelmintics as a consequence of 'leakage' into the environment, such as on non-target fauna [30] and onward impacts on their ecology and ecosystem service provision [31] need to be better understood and balanced against the beneficial impacts of treatment. The direct costs of anthelmintic resistance include the cost of the ineffective drug, the labour wastage in administering the ineffective drug, and the failure of adequate control leading to reduced production of meat and milk on a per hectare and per animal basis.…”
Section: Costing Environmental Impacts Of Drugs and Drug Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of helminth control on water use remains to be assessed but is likely to be beneficial, given the vast water requirements for maintenance and production (Ridoutt and Hodges, 2017) and the negative impact of helminths on input–output conversion (van der Voort et al 2014). On the other hand, there are undesired side-effects of helminth control such as labour input, AR development and leakage of anthelmintic residues in the environment (Cooke et al 2017) or food products (Kang et al 2017).…”
Section: Rational Integration For Future Control Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An anticipated benefit of a change from preventive to therapeutic or highly targeted treatments is that AR will develop less quickly against new anthelmintics, thus preserving a longer period of efficacy. Environmental impacts of treatment are also likely to reduce (Cooke et al 2017).…”
Section: The Use Of Anthelmintics By 2030mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the control of PGE, the concept of treating only individuals that would benefit most from anthelmintic treatment is becoming established as an approach that can mitigate the potential risk not only of anthelmintic resistance (Kenyon et al, 2013), but also environmental impact (Cooke et al, 2017), by enhancing the size of the refugia. Amongst domestic ruminants, most work on TST has been conducted in youngstock and the most promising marker is not in fact a parasitological measure, but daily live weight gain (Busin et al, 2014;Jackson et al, 2017), which has been shown to be a good surrogate for adverse effects of PGE in both lambs and young cattle.…”
Section: Targeted Selective Treatment (Tst)mentioning
confidence: 99%