2012
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2012.728707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the impacts of land-cover change on streamflow dynamics of a tropical rainforest headwater catchment

Abstract: A modelling experiment is used to examine different land-use scenarios ranging from extreme deforestation (31% forest cover) to pristine (95% forest cover) conditions and related Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes to assess whether a change in streamflow dynamics, discharge extremes and mean annual water balance of a 73.4-km 2 tropical headwater catchment in Costa Rica could be detected. A semi-distributed, conceptual rainfall-runoff model was adapted to conceptualize the empirically-based, dominant … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
28
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective percolating VPFP number, the mean and standard derivation of the VPFP diameter were all important in determining the overall runoff and base flow generation, seen from Figures c, f, and i that the R b /R values increased accordingly with the increase in both the VPFP number and size. The fact that all the R b /R values were larger than 70% indicated the large contribution of groundwater storage to streamflow, which was consistent with the results from other studies in tropical catchments [ Birkel et al ., ; Ogden et al ., ]. Maximum values of NSE log (Figures b, e, and h) were observed in relation to every VPFP parameter, which mainly corresponded to the values we estimated based on field observations and literature as discussed earlier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The effective percolating VPFP number, the mean and standard derivation of the VPFP diameter were all important in determining the overall runoff and base flow generation, seen from Figures c, f, and i that the R b /R values increased accordingly with the increase in both the VPFP number and size. The fact that all the R b /R values were larger than 70% indicated the large contribution of groundwater storage to streamflow, which was consistent with the results from other studies in tropical catchments [ Birkel et al ., ; Ogden et al ., ]. Maximum values of NSE log (Figures b, e, and h) were observed in relation to every VPFP parameter, which mainly corresponded to the values we estimated based on field observations and literature as discussed earlier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Tropical headwater catchments often have volcanic origins and exhibit stratified volcanic rocks and soils overlying steep terrain; hence, they are subjected to a complex suite of nonlinear and preferential hydrological processes. Generic conceptual models used to predict streamflow in humid tropical catchments include, among others, HBV‐light (Beck et al, ; Birkel, Soulsby, & Tetzlaff, ) and TOPMODEL (Campling, Gobin, Beven, & Reyen, ; Moličová, Grimaldi, Bonell, & Hubert, ), both showing good prediction performance but a limited capability to assess streamflow sources. More physically based and complex models such as soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) were also widely applied for simulating hydrologic behaviour of tropical catchments (Pereira, Martinez, Pruski, & da Silva, , for an example from Brazil).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This near-neutral result was attributed to the combined compensatory effect of a lower ET for pasture (leading to higher flows) and a comparatively small difference in CWI for cloud forest versus aerodynamically rough pasture (lower under the latter, leading to reduced flows). Another modeling-based study conducted in a cloud forest region in central Costa Rica also found that while conversion of catchments from primarily forest to pasture had relatively little effect on mean annual water yield (< 3%), forested catchments had lower runoff peaks and higher dryseason flows by up to 10% on short time scales (< 1-year return period) (Birkel et al 2012). This ability of forests to provide protection was not maintained for large return interval floods (< 1-year return period).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%