2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-015-1069-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the Influence of Groundwater Abstractions on the Water Level of Lake Naivasha, Kenya Under Data-Scarce Conditions

Abstract: This study presents the state-of-the-art understanding of the data-scarce and hydrogeologically complex groundwater system of Lake Naivasha, Kenya, with the particular aim of exploring the influence groundwater abstractions have on Lake Naivasha's water level. We developed multiple alternative but plausible parameterizations for a MODFLOW groundwater model, based on literature, existing models and available data, while trying not to overcomplicate the model. In doing so, we illustrate a possible strategy of go… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, adopting a WF cap requires of local (water) authorities that they know—preferably in quantitative terms—local runoff, local environmental water needs, and local water consumption (e.g., through accounting WF permits that are issued to any of the various users at any given time). In ill‐managed or data‐scarce basins, accounting of incoming and outgoing flows will pose a substantial challenge, as does their monitoring (Hogeboom et al, ). With respect to institutional hurdles, attempts to incorporate what might be considered a local WF cap in South Africa were stranded in power struggles between various levels of authority (Bourblanc & Blanchon, ).…”
Section: Toward Policy Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, adopting a WF cap requires of local (water) authorities that they know—preferably in quantitative terms—local runoff, local environmental water needs, and local water consumption (e.g., through accounting WF permits that are issued to any of the various users at any given time). In ill‐managed or data‐scarce basins, accounting of incoming and outgoing flows will pose a substantial challenge, as does their monitoring (Hogeboom et al, ). With respect to institutional hurdles, attempts to incorporate what might be considered a local WF cap in South Africa were stranded in power struggles between various levels of authority (Bourblanc & Blanchon, ).…”
Section: Toward Policy Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large sensitivity of lakebed seepage to λ and K, emphasizes the importance of their reliable parameterization. The importance of the λ parameter has already been Table 2 The sensitivity of lakebed seepage to changes of lakebed leakance (λ) and shallow aquifer hydraulic conductivity K when testing: (1) 4-years average of daily net lake seepage (L LKnet ); (2) daily average of lake seepage into groundwater at the maximum lake stage (L LKout ); and (3) max shoreline seepage at maximum lake stage (L LKout ); all using 10 and 0.1 multiplication factors of λ and K emphasized, for example by Hogeboom et al (2015), but large L LKnet sensitivity to the increase of shallow aquifer K, three times larger than to the increase of λ, is surprising and relevant. Fortunately, in this TL study, the λ and K were well defined; considering λ, the lakebed thickness was directly measured through regular underwater sampling schema ( Fig.…”
Section: Calibration and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data issue constitutes the main limitation to groundwater models applications, specifically in developing countries, where data are often scarce and sometimes affected by high uncertainty. Some attempts have been made to overcome this issue in order to use numerical modeling in such cases [41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%