Modelling the influencing of green entrepreneurship orientation on sustainable firm performance: a moderated mediation model

Appiah, Michael Karikari; Sam, Aloysius; Twum, Emmanuel; Godslove, Enchill

doi:10.1080/1331677x.2023.2179094

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 66 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These practices include reducing hazardous waste, offering green education programs, conducting green workshops, organising eco-friendly practices and developing green products that add value to ecological initiatives. By embracing green practices, manufacturers in both less developed and developing economies can promote sustainability, alleviate poverty, reduce stakeholder pressure and enhance their GDP (Karikari Appiah et al , 2023). Large firms that adopt such practices significantly foster job creation, increase income levels and drive economic growth.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Green entrepreneurial orientation and technological green innovation: does resources orchestration capability matter?

Al Koliby,

Al-Hakimi,

Zaid

et al. 2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Although green entrepreneurial orientation (GEO) has received much attention, it is unclear whether it affects technological green innovation (GI). Therefore, this study aims to understand how GEO affects technological GI, with its dimensions green product innovation (GPRODI) and green process innovation (GPROCI), as well as to explore whether resource orchestration capability (ROC) moderates the relationships between them. Design/methodology/approach Based on a cross-sectional survey design, data were gathered from 177 managers of large manufacturing firms in Yemen and analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling via SmartPLS software. Findings The results revealed that GEO positively affects both GPRODI and GPROCI, with a higher effect on GPROCI. Importantly, ROC does, in fact, positively moderate the link between GEO and GPRODI. Research limitations/implications This research adds to knowledge by combining GEO, ROC and technological GI into a unified framework, considering the perspectives of the resource-based view and the resource orchestration theory. However, the study’s use of cross-sectional survey data makes it impossible to infer causes. This is because GEO, ROC and technological GI all have effects on time that this empirical framework cannot account for. Practical implications The findings from this research provide valuable insights for executives and decision makers of large manufacturing companies, who are expected to show increasing interest in adopting ROC into their organisations. This suggests that environmentally-conscious entrepreneurial firms can enhance their GI efforts by embracing ROC. Social implications By adopting the proposed framework, firms can carry out their activities in ways that do not harm environmental and societal well-being, as simply achieving high economic performance is no longer sufficient. Originality/value Theoretically, the results offer an in-depth understanding of the role of GEO in the technological GI domain by indicating that GEO can promote GPRODI and GPROCI. In addition, the results shed new light on the boundaries of GEO from the perspective of resource orchestration theory. Furthermore, the findings present important insights for managers aiming to enhance their comprehension of leveraging GEO and ROC to foster technological GI.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Green entrepreneurial orientation and technological green innovation: does resources orchestration capability matter?

Al Koliby,

Al-Hakimi,

Zaid

et al. 2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Innovative performance in Green Enterpreneurship (GE) serves as a significant mediator in the connection between environmentally friendly dynamic capabilities and sustainable performance (Nordin and Hassan, 2019). Therefore, strategic policies and related institutions have been established to provide support for Green Enterpreneurship (GE) (Prasetyo et al, 2023;Appiah et al, 2023). Green Enterpreneurship (GE) has progressively integrated with various other disciplines to strengthen entrepreneurship and new institutional theories (Thurik et al, 2023).…”

Section: Institutions Green Enterpreneurship (Ge) and Sustainable Dev...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Potential of Informal Institutions in Promoting Green Enterpreneurship (Ge) and Sustainable Socio-Economic Development

Prasetyo,

Azwardi,

Kistanti

2023

Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The continuity of the green environment, economy, and entrepreneur-ship is essential for sustainable development. Therefore, this research aims to explored the potential of informal institutions in promoting Green Enterpreneurship (GE) and sustainable socio-economic development. The method employed used microeconomic data rooted in local wisdom, social norms, and localized moral commitments from various regions of Indonesia. Data collection comprised surveys and structured interviews relevant to the research objectives. Quantitative data material was obtained by conducting a field survey of 150 household samples of green entrepreneurship respondents taken representatively in various regions using simple random sampling techniques. The design employed a two-stage mixed-method approach, including exploratory and explanatory designs. The result showed the significance of Green Enterpreneurship (GE) in mitigating the impacts of global climate change and economic crises, thereby contributing to the attainment of sustainable development goals. However, the main results of the research confirm that the capacity of formal institutions has not been able to navigate the complexity of these problems isssues is limited. Conversely, informal institutions, though capable of mitigating global climate change and advancing sustainable development, remained localized and lacked national and global integration and collaboration. Green Enterpreneurship (GE), as a form of social innovation, gave rise to new models of socio-economic solidarity within unique local communities. The research also underscored the pivotal role of informal institutions in facilitating these endeavors, thereby filling a void in high-quality new institutional economic theory

show abstract

“…GEO and GI have the potential to enhance the comprehension of SME managers regarding the determinants that contribute to the sustainable performance of businesses (Muangmee et al, 2021). GEO positively influences both GI and firm performance regarding environmental, social, and financial aspects (Appiah et al, 2023;Muangmee et al, 2021). To enhance the relationship between sustainable performance and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), managers must implement Green Technology Dynamism (GTD) and promote environmental consciousness (Tze San et al, 2022).…”

Section: The Ways Of Improving Green Entrepreneurial Orientationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In (Appiah et al, 2023) study, it was discovered that the presence of Green Innovative Capability greatly impacted the relationship between GEO and GI performance. This finding suggests that the ability of a company to develop and implement GI effectively plays a crucial role in determining the success of its green entrepreneurial endeavours.…”

Section: The Moderating Factors Influence Geo and Gi Relationshipmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This includes research and development capabilities, technological expertise, access to green networks and partnerships, and the ability to integrate sustainability into various aspects of the business. (Appiah et al, 2023) study found that companies with solid Green Innovative Capability were more likely to translate GEO into successful GI performance. This suggests that having the necessary resources and capabilities to support GI efforts is crucial for companies to capitalize on their GEO effectively.…”

Section: The Moderating Factors Influence Geo and Gi Relationshipmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Green Entrepreneurial Orientation and Green Innovation in SMEs: An Evidence from Systematic Literature Review and Opportunities for Future Research Agenda

Zonna Lia,

Fitri

2023

JEFMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable development goals agenda has been spread among macro and microeconomy in a country. At the micro level, entrepreneurship has become one of the rarest areas to be in touch with "greenness." Especially in Indonesia, there are many reasons why sustainable variables could only be implemented sparingly. This research aims to give insight into how to implement the green entrepreneurial orientation and green innovation and explain its catalyst and restraints on Indonesia's SMEs. The result found that several factors enhance the GEO and GI implementations, such as green dynamic capabilities, green market orientation, CSR, etc.

show abstract

Modelling the influencing of green entrepreneurship orientation on sustainable firm performance: a moderated mediation model

Cited by 7 publications

References 66 publications

Green entrepreneurial orientation and technological green innovation: does resources orchestration capability matter?

Green entrepreneurial orientation and technological green innovation: does resources orchestration capability matter?

The Potential of Informal Institutions in Promoting Green Enterpreneurship (Ge) and Sustainable Socio-Economic Development

Green Entrepreneurial Orientation and Green Innovation in SMEs: An Evidence from Systematic Literature Review and Opportunities for Future Research Agenda

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About