2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the interphase of 3D printed photo-cured polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the 6 times larger facet size of the DIC recordings as compared to the micro-brick size has likely led to the averaging of strains in the regions where sharp step transitions were present, blurring the measured step feature. Second, partial resin mixing at the interface between the micro-bricks may have resulted in a gradual transition of the elastic properties across the steps, similar to what other studies have suggested [37,43,47,48]. In contrast, none of these effects were present when simplifying the outcome from the FEM estimations into systems of linear springs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the 6 times larger facet size of the DIC recordings as compared to the micro-brick size has likely led to the averaging of strains in the regions where sharp step transitions were present, blurring the measured step feature. Second, partial resin mixing at the interface between the micro-bricks may have resulted in a gradual transition of the elastic properties across the steps, similar to what other studies have suggested [37,43,47,48]. In contrast, none of these effects were present when simplifying the outcome from the FEM estimations into systems of linear springs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Moreover, the relationship between the numbers of hard and soft micro-bricks and the realized macroscale properties is often assumed to be linear, neglecting its highly nonlinear nature. It has already been shown that such assumptions can lead to inaccurate estimations of effective mechanical behavior [35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of these peaks was likely caused by the limited DIC resolution (i.e., between 22 × 10 3 and 27 × 10 3 facets per experiment), which was approximately six times lower than the resolution of the 3D-printed specimens (i.e., 147 × 10 3 voxels). Furthermore, blending of the photopolymers prior to curing might have significantly reduced the magnitudes of the strain peaks 42 , 43 . The FEM predictions were, therefore, more discerning when trying to understand the effects of geometrical design on the mechanical performance of soft–hard interfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, an analysis of the effects of photopolymer blending (Supplementary Note 6 , Supplementary Fig. 12 , and Supplementary Videos 15 – 18 ) showed that even though material mixing can improve the performance of photopolymer composites, the general observations regarding the effects of various geometrical design alternatives on the performance of the interfaces remain unchanged 42 , 43 . Experimental studies of such effects are currently not possible outside multi-material Polyjet printing due to technological limitations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%