2013
DOI: 10.1080/0305215x.2013.812727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the Pareto-optimal set using B-spline basis functions for continuous multi-objective optimization problems

Abstract: In the past few years, multi-objective optimization algorithms have been extensively applied in several fields including engineering design problems. A major reason is the advancement of evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithms that are able to find a set of non-dominated points spread on the respective Pareto-optimal front in a single simulation. Besides just finding a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, one is often interested in capturing knowledge about the variation of variable values over … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimizing only the control points of the Bézier curve, that define its curvature, enforces the decision variables of solutions in the approximation set to vary in a smooth, continuous fashion, thereby likely improving intuitive navigability of the approximation set. Previous work on parameterizations of the approximation set has been applied mainly in a post-processing step after optimization, or was performed in the objective space [3,15,19], but this does not aid in the navigability of the approximation set in decision space. Moreover, fitting a smooth curve through an already optimized set of solutions might result in a bad fit, resulting in a lower-quality approximation set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimizing only the control points of the Bézier curve, that define its curvature, enforces the decision variables of solutions in the approximation set to vary in a smooth, continuous fashion, thereby likely improving intuitive navigability of the approximation set. Previous work on parameterizations of the approximation set has been applied mainly in a post-processing step after optimization, or was performed in the objective space [3,15,19], but this does not aid in the navigability of the approximation set in decision space. Moreover, fitting a smooth curve through an already optimized set of solutions might result in a bad fit, resulting in a lower-quality approximation set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimizing only the control points of the Bézier curve, that define its curvature, enforces the decision variables of solutions in the approximation set to vary in a smooth, continuous fashion, thereby likely improving intuitive navigability of the approximation set. Previous work on parameterizations of the approximation set has been applied mainly in a post-processing step after optimization, or was performed in the objective space [17,3,24], but this does not aid in the navigability of the approximation set in decision space. Moreover, fitting a smooth curve through an already optimized set of solutions might result in a bad fit, resulting in a lower-quality approximation set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, GP-based MOO has recently generated a substantial activity in the statistical and optimization communities, with focuses either on sampling strategies (Ponweiser, Wagner, Biermann, and Vincze 2008;Wagner, Emmerich, Deutz, and Ponweiser 2010;Svenson 2011;Emmerich, Deutz, and Klinkenberg 2011;Picheny 2015;Zuluaga, Sergent, Krause, and Püschel 2013) or on uncertainty quantification (Bhardwaj, Dasgupta, and Deb 2014;Calandra, Peters, and Deisenroth 2014;Binois, Ginsbourger, and Roustant 2015a). GPareto aims at filling this gap by making most of the recent approaches available in a unified implementation to both MOO experts and end-users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%