2010
DOI: 10.2495/su100151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the response of UHPFRC panels to explosive loading

Abstract: Explosive testing of full-size fibre-reinforced concrete panels was conducted at GL Industrial Services at Spadeadam test site, Cumbria, England in 2008. The panels were manufactured by VSL Australia and shipped to Spadeadam for testing. This paper reports these tests and a simplified analysis of the response of the panels. Each panel measured 3.5m by 1.3m by 100mm thick. The panels were contained within a large concrete enclosure to minimise clearing around the sides from the blast wave and placed between 7m … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barnett et al (2010) tested UHPC panels of 3.50 9 1.30 9 0.10 m in size under blast loading using 100 kg TNT placed at different distances (7, 9 and 12 m). UHPC panels with conventional rebar reinforcement were able to sustain blast pressure of around 2500 kPa; UHPC panels incorporating steel fibers broke into two pieces at a blasting pressure of 500 kPa (Schleyer et al 2011). These experimental results correlated well with numerical findings (Mao et al 2014).…”
Section: Uhpc Under Dynamic and Impact Loadingsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Barnett et al (2010) tested UHPC panels of 3.50 9 1.30 9 0.10 m in size under blast loading using 100 kg TNT placed at different distances (7, 9 and 12 m). UHPC panels with conventional rebar reinforcement were able to sustain blast pressure of around 2500 kPa; UHPC panels incorporating steel fibers broke into two pieces at a blasting pressure of 500 kPa (Schleyer et al 2011). These experimental results correlated well with numerical findings (Mao et al 2014).…”
Section: Uhpc Under Dynamic and Impact Loadingsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This absence provided the impetus for the work reported in this article, which formed part of a project to investigate the blast and impact resistance of UHPFRC [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The high-energy absorption capacity of UHP-FRC, combined with its high resistance to scabbing, spalling, and fragmentation [7][8][9][10][11], makes it ideal for protective shields. The construction of shield plates plays an essential part in protecting existing strategic buildings against extreme loading conditions caused by blast, shock or impact loads [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: One Of the Potential Applications Of Uhp-frc Is In Protectiv...mentioning
confidence: 99%